Prоmpt: Reflect оn whаt yоu hаve leаrned in this course about how mental health conditions are diagnosed and treated. How has this knowledge influenced the way you think about psychopathology and treatment? In your response, you must: Identify and briefly describe a psychological disorder. Reference at least one evidence-based treatment for that disorder. Discuss how course content has shaped your understanding of these topics. Focus on how this information can be applied in real-world situations. Writing Tips Maintain a scientific and professional tone throughout. Avoid personal storytelling; instead, support your ideas using key concepts from the course and relevant research. Formatting: Comprehensive but concise; scientific and professional; reference scholarly work where appropriate (can be an informal reference such as "according to the textbook" or "according to Dr. Agnes' lecture on...") Time limit: 75 minutes Additional Information: The Final Course Assessment is CLOSED book/notes and must be completed independently. Each submission will be individually assessed for authenticity. Policy violations will result in sanctioning in accordance with the USF 3.027 Regulation). Rubric: 100 points Identification and Characterization of Psychological Disorder (20 points) 18–20 points: Disorder is clearly identified and thoroughly described with diagnostic features and context. 12–17 points: Disorder is identified with some detail; may lack depth or precision. 0–11 points: Disorder is unclear, inaccurately described, or missing. Reference to Evidence-Based Treatment (20 points) 18–20 points: Treatment is clearly named, accurately described, and supported by research. 12–17 points: Treatment is referenced but lacks detail, specificity, or scientific grounding. 0–11 points: Treatment is vague, inaccurate, or not referenced. Understanding of Course Concepts (20 points) 18–20 points: Demonstrates strong grasp of key principles; integrates multiple course concepts effectively. 12–17 points: Shows general understanding with minor inaccuracies or limited integration. 0–11 points: Minimal understanding or major conceptual errors. Application to Real-World Contexts (20 points) 18–20 points: Clearly explains real-world relevance; provides specific examples or scenarios. 12–17 points: Some application but lacks depth or specificity. 0–11 points: Little to no connection to real-world contexts. Scientific and Professional Tone (10 points) 9–10 points: Consistently professional; avoids informal language and personal storytelling. 6–8 points: Mostly professional with occasional informal tone or minor personal references. 0–5 points: Informal tone or inappropriate personal content. Use of Scientific Literature (5 points) 5 points: Effectively references relevant research or theories; supports claims with evidence. 3–4 points: Some reference to literature or theories, but lacks integration or specificity. 0–2 points: No reference to scientific literature or unsupported claims. Organization and Clarity (5 points) 5 points: Well-structured, clear flow of ideas; free of grammar or spelling errors. 3–4 points: Generally organized with minor clarity or mechanical issues. 0–2 points: Poorly organized or difficult to follow; frequent errors.
The nurse is cаring fоr а pаtient whо has experienced a surgery and the wоund edges brought together by staples. The nurse recalls that this type of wound heals by