A pаtient’s EEG аmplitude аppears abnоrmally high; which adjustment shоuld be made first?
A student grоup аt а public U.S. cоllege invites а cоntroversial political speaker to campus. The speaker is known for using harsh language and making inflammatory remarks about several social groups. In response, some students organize a protest, arguing that the event promotes hate and harms college/student well-being. Others students argue that disinviting or “canceling” the speaker would violate principles of free expression and open inquiry that public colleges are supposed to protect.When the event takes place, protestors loudly disrupt the talk, preventing the speaker from finishing prematurely ending the event. The college later disciplines several students for for violating the college's "community standards of civility,” sparking further debate about whether civility policies can coexist with robust free speech protections.Using the ethical concepts and principles from this week’s chapter on tolerance, civility, and free speech, analyze the ethical issues involved in this case. Then evaluate how the college handled the situation in light of those values and principles—explaining whether you ultimately agree or disagree with its decisions, and why.⚠️ Reminder: Submitting any part of this Learning Evaluation created in whole or part using AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, etc.) or AI-enhanced writing/translation platforms (e.g., Grammarly, QuillBot, DeepL, Google Translate, Wordtune, Microsoft Editor, etc.) is a violation of this course’s Academic Integrity policy (see Syllabus).Like other forms of plagiarism, it is considered academic misrepresentation or fraud—because you are submitting work generated by someone or something else as your own. This includes editing suggestions or rephrasings produced by AI-based writing assistants.If you're ever unsure whether something you're using is allowed, ask first.