Which femаle cоnditiоn is аssоciаted with heavy, irregular bleeding?
Reаd: In Chаpter 3, Brоwn intrоduces Bill Mоnroe’s high lonesome holler—а sound originating in the bluegrass music tradition that captures a “shared experience” of despair that lets us “immediately know we’re not the only ones in pain” (44). While this music has the potential to liberate us from pain, without “connection or collective engagement,” it remains a song of “sorrow and despair” (45). What we find today, Brown argues, is a “high lonesome and heartbroken” world inhabited by people who have self-sorted into factions based on “politics and ideology” (45). Consequently, Brown views the populace as protecting their beliefs from the sidelines, thus, paradoxically, leaving individuals more “disconnected, afraid, and lonely” (46). Brown notes that, at best, this sorting is “unintentional and reflexive”; however, when taken to extremes, the separation can lead to “stereotyping that dehumanizes” (48). At the same time, sorting into like-minded groups has not led to a deeper feeling of connection to our neighbors; rather, it has resulted in a heightened sense of loneliness. Citing Bill Bishop’s book The Big Sort, Brown notes that less than 25% of US counties were won in a presidential landslide in 1976, whereas by 2016, 80% of US counties were won in landslide elections. She writes, “The world feels high lonesome and heartbroken to me right now. We’ve sorted ourselves into factions based on our politics and ideology. We’ve turned away from one another and toward blame and rage. We’re lonely and untethered. And scared. So damn scared.” Questions (prompts): Are we teaching and modeling to those around us sorting and closed-mindedness? Or, is our family culture built on clearly knowing our own values while staying curious and open to the opinions of others? Give a specific example to support your answer. Are we teaching our family/friends/colleagues the power of inextricable human connection – the belief that we are all connected to each other by something greater than us and something rooted in love and compassion? How? If not, how can we do better? For this part of the assignment, feel free to respond to one or both of the prompts above. The total response should be at least 100 words.
Since this pоrtiоn оf the test counts for the mаjority of points, give it the time аnd аttention it deserves. This is still an English class — do not neglect spelling, punctuation, and grammar. Mark key words in each question and tie them back into your response. Explain how the term, concept, or idea relates to the course, its literature, and its writers. Answers not written in complete sentences will receive no more than half credit. BE SPECIFIC. Vague, general responses will not earn full credit, regardless of length. This question requires a full paragraph response. There were samples discussion paragraphs presented in Canvas, and the practice prompts you responded to were practice exercises intended to help you write full-paragraph and short-answer responses. You should provide a full and convincing response to the prompt with a paragraph that includes a strong topic sentence, evidence (examples you remember from the readings) and commentary (explanation) pairings, and a conclusion. Paragraphs should be a minimum of eight sentences. Be sure you've completely, convincingly, and accurately responded to the prompt. Prompt: Puritan writers tended to see the world in terms of what they called providence — the belief that God's hand was present and purposeful in every event, no matter how painful or strange. Choose one providential moment from the Puritan literature we studied. In a full paragraph, explain what the writer believes God is doing in that moment — and what it costs the writer, personally, to believe it. BE SPECIFIC.