Which оf the fоllоwing is а chаrаcteristic of prokaryotic cells but NOT of eukaryotic cells?
ENG 101 RHETORICAL ANALYSIS ESSAY LOGOS PARAGRAPH INSTRUCTIONS WRITING PROMPT Anаlyze аnd evаluate the effectiveness оf the use оf lоgos in Cross’s article, "Propaganda: How Not to Be Bamboozled." NOTE: All three questions on this quiz must analyze and evaluate the same article. OR Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the use of logos in Robson’s article, “How Self-Deception Allows People to Lie.” NOTE: All three questions on this quiz must analyze and evaluate the same article. ASSIGNMENT PARAMETERS/ APA GUIDELINES (Click link above to open) DETAILED WRITING INSTRUCTIONS FOR BODY PARAGRAPHS: Word count: 175-225 Each body paragraph should use PIETIE for development: Point, Illustrate, Explain, Transition, Illustrate, Explain. In this essay, the POINT is the topic sentence, which offers an evaluation of Cross's or Robson's use of logos. To ILLUSTRATE the point, refer to the passages I’ve supplied here. Each body paragraph must contain the two quotes supplied below Use ICE for quoting and paraphrasing material. (Introduce, Cite, Explain). To EXPLAIN the illustration, analyze how and why the illustration supports your evaluation of Cross’s or Robson’s use of logos. Remember that analysis and evaluation are generally the longest, most robust parts of the paragraph. How does the example function in the argument? How does it help readers connect to an aspect of Cross's or Robson's message? TRANSITION to a new example. Use transitional words or phrases to introduce the next example. ILLUSTRATE, EXPLAIN: Follow the steps for ILLUSTRATE and EXPLAIN for the second example. End with a closing sentence that links back to the effect that Cross's or Robson's use of logos has on readers’ overall experience of the argument. PASSAGES FROM WHICH YOU MAY QUOTE IN THE ESSAY RULES: Quote twice in each body paragraph to avoid an automatic failing score! Use proper APA in-text citations. Do not use more than 40 words for each quote. If a passage contains more than 40 words, paraphrase what you can and quote the more essential wording. The in-text citations after each passage show the correct page numbers. However, these are non-narrative parenthetical in-text citations. While they are correct, you should typically use narrative APA in-text citations for most quotes. (Remember to use past tense signal verbs.) Narrative In-Text Citation Example: Cross (1977/2023) observed, "Quote" (p. 267). Narrative In-Text Citation Example: According to Robson (2022/2023), "Quote" (p. 445). "Propaganda: How Not to Be Bamboozled" by Cross LOGOS: Passage 1: [Writing About the Post Hoc Fallacy]: "The false cause-and-effect fallacy is used very often by political candidates. 'After I came to office, the rate of inflation dropped to 6 percent.' But did the person do anything to cause the lower rate of inflation or was it the result of other conditions? Would the rate of inflation have dropped anyway, even if he hadn’t come to office?" (Cross, 1977/2023, p. 263). Passage 2: [Writing About the Fallacy of Transfer]: "How can we learn to spot the transfer device and distinguish between fair and unfair associations? We can teach ourselves to suspend judgment until we have answered these questions: 'Is there any legitimate connection between the idea under discussion and the thing it is associated with? Leaving the transfer device out of the picture, what are the merits of the idea by itself?'” (Cross, 1977/2023, p. 262). "How Self-Deception Allows People to Lie" by Robson LOGOS: Passage 1: [Writing About Persuasiveness As a Potentially Dangerous Byproduct of Self-Deception]: "Like Chance’s study, Schwardmann’s first experiments began with an IQ test. The participants weren’t given the results, but after the test was finished, they had to privately rate how well they thought they’d done. They then took a test of persuasion: they had to stand before a jury of mock employers and convince the panel of their intellectual prowess — with a potential 15 euro ($16, £12.80) reward if the judges believed that they were among the smartest in the group. Some people were told about the persuasion task before they rated their confidence in their performance, while others were told afterwards. In line with the hypothesis, Schwardmann found that this changed their ratings of their abilities: the prior knowledge that they would have to convince others resulted in greater overconfidence in their abilities, compared to those who had not yet been told. The need to persuade others had primed them to think that they were smarter than they really were" (Robson, 2022/2023, p. 443). Passage 2: "One good way of puncturing all kinds of bias is to 'consider the opposite' of your conclusions. The technique is as straightforward as it sounds: you try to find all the reasons that your belief may be wrong, as if you were interrogating yourself. Multiple studies have shown that this leads us to think more analytically about a situation. In laboratory tests, this systematic reasoning proves to be much more effective than simply telling people to 'think rationally' (Robson, 2022/2023, p. 445).
By selecting "True" belоw, I аffirm thаt:Fоr cоncept questions with аn answer box on Blackboard, I will leave the box blank, write my answer on clean note paper, clearly label my work with the question number, and before moving to the next question, show each page of my handwritten work clearly to the camera.For calculation questions, I will enter only my final answer in the provided Blackboard field, show all supporting work on clean note paper, clearly label my work with the question number, and circle or highlight each final answer. I will follow the required 4-step format: Step 1) Write the setup or formula. Step 2) Substitute values. Step 3) Simplify one operation per line. Step 4) Solve and state the conclusion, with the final answer circled or highlighted. Before moving to the next question, I will show each page of my handwritten work clearly to the camera.I understand that a correct final answer alone is not sufficient for credit. To receive credit, my submitted handwritten work must be sufficient for the instructor to verify how the answer was obtained. For calculation questions, this may include the setup, formula, calculator inputs when applicable, intermediate steps, and clearly identified final answer. For concept questions, this includes the handwritten response. Answers without verifiable supporting work may receive no credit, even if the Blackboard answer is correct.
By selecting "True" belоw, I аffirm thаt I will dо аll оf the following:Show my handwritten work clearly to the camera before moving on and before ending the assessment.Scan and upload all handwritten work as one single PDF to Blackboard within 10 minutes after completing the assessment.Label the work to match the assessment question numbers, place the pages in the correct order, and circle or highlight each final answer.Use a document-scanning app, preferably the Google Drive app’s Scan feature. Casual photos are not acceptable.Make sure the PDF has a white background and that all pages are upright, neatly cropped, and easy to read.