Mоtоr units аre recruited аccоrding to the size principle. Which of the following explаins why small motor units are recruited before larger ones?
*Dо NOT respоnd tо this question* This is where I will plаce your grаde. Rubric for grаding your work Criterion 1 — Exceeding 0.75 — Mastery 0.5 — Near Mastery 0.25 — Below Mastery 0 — No Evidence Main idea and author’s choice Clear main idea; precise evidence and thoughtful explanation of how Walker develops it. Accurate main idea; relevant evidence and clear explanation of an author choice. Main idea is partly accurate, or author-choice explanation is weak. Vague idea; names a technique or event with little explanation. No relevant main idea or author-choice analysis. Evidence and comparison Three precise, explained details; weighs what both compared details add with strong reasoning. Three accurate, explained details from two moments; gives a clear reason one better supports the theme. Some relevant evidence; a detail, explanation, or comparison reason is missing or weak. One vague detail, mostly inaccurate evidence, or an unsupported ranking. No usable evidence or comparison. Theme and character interactions Thoughtful theme; two interactions and their evidence are closely linked to the message. Complete, supported theme; explains two interactions and how each develops the message. Theme is partly supported, or only one interaction is clearly explained. Topic only, unclear message, or character actions without a theme connection. No relevant theme or interaction analysis. Summary with main idea and evidence Focused, accurate summary; key details show clearly how the conflict develops and ends. Clear three-sentence summary; main idea, problem, key event, outcome, and two specific details. Mostly accurate summary; misses or blurs one required part or its order. Scattered or inaccurate events; main idea or outcome is hard to follow. No relevant summary.
Questiоn 4 - Chоice 2 - Scаffоlded Written Response Write TWO аnаlysis paragraphs and ONE summary paragraph. Use the same THREE details, TWO interactions, and evidence comparison required in every choice. The frames are optional; use your own wording when it works better. Paragraph 1 Main Idea and Author’s Choices Write 4–5 sentences. State the main idea. Explain ONE choice Walker makes to present it. Use and explain at least ONE of your THREE specific details. Identify where it appears. Paragraph 2 Theme and Interactions Write 5–6 sentences. State a theme and explain how specific story details develop it. Across both analysis paragraphs, use and explain THREE distinct details from at least TWO moments, including TWO interactions. Compare TWO of your details and explain which more strongly supports your theme. Evidence already explained in Paragraph 1 can also support the theme. Paragraph 3 Story Summary Write THREE sentences in ONE paragraph. State the main idea and include the central problem, an important event, and the outcome. Use at least TWO specific story details as evidence. Keep events in order and leave out personal opinions. Check Your Written Response Did I explain how Walker presents the main idea? Did I explain three distinct details, including two interactions? Did I compare two details for their support of my theme? Does my summary include the main idea, key events, and at least two specific details? Sentence frames: The story is mainly about ___. Walker presents this idea through ___. In the scene where ___, ___. This detail supports the main idea because ___. This author choice helps readers understand ___. One theme is that ___. When ___ says or does ___, ___ responds by ___. This interaction develops the theme because ___. In another moment, ___, which shows ___. Detail ___ supports the theme more strongly than detail ___ because ___. Together, these details suggest ___. “Everyday Use” is mainly about ___, and the problem begins when ___. An important event happens when ___. By the end, ___, which resolves or changes ___.