The law of non-contradiction holds that:

In the search for knowledge, a controlled scientific study is:

Inductive strength requires all of the following EXCEPT:

Inferring human-like malicious intent in the waves that capsize one’s boat is an example of:

Which of the following are we logically entitled to conclude from the claim, “Scientific accounts of the world have been false before”?

Which of the following is NOT one of our authors’ truths for the reasonable skeptic?

Memory is selective in nature.

“This standard coin, fairly flipped, has come up heads each of the last 100 times that I flipped it; thus, it’s extremely likely that it’ll come up tails on the next flip.” This is an example of:

No deductive arguments are cogent.

Someone’s inability to disprove a claim is evidence that it’s true.