California is a big state geographically with a large population. Alaska is a bigger state geographically but has a much smaller population. Yet both states have two representatives in the Senate (Senators). This is an example of:

The internal chaos of Iraq following the US occupation of Iraq (2003-2011)…

Of the options below, which has been the principal objective of outside powers in the 20th century with respect to their policies towards the governments of the Middle Eastern countries?

Michael Klare and Molly Farneth have both written various pieces for you to read, what is one of their basic conceptions with respect to the US military? In the lecture videos and PowerPoints I even referred to this dynamic with respect to strategic alliances of the US in the Persian Gulf.                 (A)

With respect to hegemony, which of the following is ‘NOT’ one of the stages of comparative advantage in industrial production that the hegemon achieves over competing economies?

All of the following are components of an ‘Illiberal democracy’ BUT ONE. Name the one that is ‘not’ a feature of an ‘illiberal democracy’.

Within the world systems framework, the elite are the principal promoters of the general celebration of nationalism. Why? Although some or all options may have some article of truth about it, select the ROOT, BEST and the MOST COMPREHENSIVE answer.

Somebody suggests that the world’s economic and environmental problems are resolvable through the institution of national democracy; in other words, somebody suggests that a world with more democratic states indicates that national democracy is an institution that can sponsor our collective improvement as a species. What is the problem with this assertion?

With respect to world-systems analysis, what are the two principal reasons for the erosion of hegemony?

What is the term “The Politics of Failure” referring to?