In a particular cell, there is no net movement of water. The amount leaving the cell and entering the cell is the same. In what type of environment is this cell found? 

I understand that all tests will be administered ON-LINE using Honorlock Extension and a webcam.   I understand that I MUST have a photo id (state DL, military ID, passport) in order to take my exams on HonorLock Extension   I also must use a webcam when using HonorLock Extension.

I understand that there will be assignments with due dates. Some of the assignments require learning new technology.  I also understand that it is required that will have to use McGraw Connect online access as it is required to complete some of my assignments.

I understand that this course requires basic Canvas knowledge. If I am struggling with Canvas, I can contact the Canvas help desk (phone, chat, email)., which is available 24/7.  I also understand that if I need help with HonorLock Extension or McGraw-Hill Connect, there is a ‘Technical Support’ module on the course site’s Modules page that has contact information for both.

I understand that iPads CANNOT be used for testing. 

Xander is accused of stealing a digital camera. Allegedly, Xander entered the accessories section of the store, peeled off the price tag of a $30 accessory, walked into the digital camera section of the store, selected a $500 digital camera, and covered the camera’s actual price tag with the $30 price tag. When the clerk scanned the item, he failed to notice the price tag switch, and Xander was able to leave the store after paying only $30. The clerk has identified Xander as the shopper who presented the wrongly tagged camera. Xander claims that he was not the one who committed this crime and that the store clerk misidentified him. The prosecutor wants to admit evidence that last year, Xander stole a $1500 cell phone by pasting a computer price tag from a $150 cell phone case onto the cell phone’s packaging, paying only $150 for the phone. Is this evidence admissible?

Same facts as #72.   Asked by plaintiff’s counsel whether Dorit said anything about how her injury happened, Dr. Thorne would testify, “She told me that she couldn’t recall, but? She heard that someone thought that she’d fallen on the Caste Iron Grill’s stairs.”  Counsel objects.  Should the judge admit or exclude Dr. Thorne’s proffered testimony?

The following labor standards have been established for a particular product: Standard labor-hours per unit of output 8.6 hours Standard labor rate $ 15.80 per hour The following data pertain to operations concerning the product for the last month: Actual hours worked 10,700 hours Actual total labor cost $ 167,455 Actual output 1,500 units What is the labor rate variance for the month?

Murphy arrived late for his afternoon appointment with Finch, his attorney, about a probate matter. Finch saw that Murphy had been drinking heavily. Murphy staggered as he was ushered into Finch’s office; Murphy’s breath smelled of alcohol. In a slurred voice, Murphy apologized for being late. He explained that he had a “few drinks” with some friends and “lost track” of time. During the interview, Murphy rambled incoherently, and Finch finally suggested that the appointment be rescheduled. As Murphy left the office, Finch offered to call an Uber, but Murphy insisted on driving. Finch watched with trepidation as Murphy drove away. Two blocks down the street Murphy collided with a parked car. He was not injured and fled the scene on foot. In his later trial for hit-and-run and drunk driving, Murphy is represented by another lawyer. The state of Hawaii calls Finch as a witness. Murphy’s attorney objects. In response, the state’s prosecutor cited Hawaii’s Code 503, which codifies its attorney-client privilege as follows:  A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the client (1) between the client or the client’s representative and the lawyer or the lawyer’s representative, or (2) between the lawyer and the lawyer’s representative. . . There is no privilege under this rule: (1)  If the services of the lawyer were sought, obtained, or used to enable or aid anyone to commit or plan to commit what the client knew or reasonably should have known to be a crime or fraud; (2)  As to a communication reflecting the client’s intent to commit a criminal or fraudulent act that the lawyer reasonably believes is likely to result in death or substantial bodily harm, or in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another; . . .  (4)  As to a communication relevant to an issue of breach of duty by the lawyer to the client or by the client to the lawyer; If Murphy claims attorney-client privilege, can Finch, nonetheless, be required to testify?

The Fidget Widget Corporation sued the Copies R Us Company for infringing its Super Fidget Widget patent. The Fidget Widget Corporation’s vice president gave a deposition, under oath, about the timing of the invention underlying the patent. The deposition testimony was significant to support Fidget Widget Corporation’s claims regarding their patent and its validity. Both companies ultimately settled their dispute. One year later, Fidget Widget sued Knockoff City Corporation for infringing the Fidget Widget patent. However, by this time, Fidget Widget’s vice president died. At the Knockoff City trial, Fidget Widget proffers portions of the vice president’s deposition to support their patent’s validity. How can Knockoff City argue against admission of Fidget Widget’s proffered evidence?