Which of the following government interests are protected by the rule that searches incident to arrest are reasonable? I. the interest in protecting law enforcement officers II. the interest in preserving evidence III. the interest in the suspects reasonable expectation of privacy IV. the interest in preventing the escape of suspects

Police officers can automatically frisk all citizens whom they stop.

In Graham v. Connor (1989), involving the arrest of a diabetic who was suffering from an insulin reaction, the Supreme Court held that claims of excessive force in the course of making an arrest are to be analyzed under

Who among the following can give consent for a third person? I. parents for their minor children II. roommates for those who share apartments with them III. wife consents to a search of house she shares with spouse IV. janitor consents to search of his suspect employer’s premises

The vehicle exception to the warrant requirement is based upon

The open fields doctrine protects land from intrusion where owners have put up “no trespassing” signs.

When a suspect is in possession of a cellular phone the police may

In Knowles v. Iowa, concerning an instance where a driver had been given a citation for speeding but had not been arrested, the Supreme Court

According to the Supreme Court opinion in Terry v. Ohio,

The three countervailing law enforcement interests against “no-knock” entry requirements identified by Justice Thomas in Wilson v. Arkansas include I. safety of officers. II. safety of occupants. III. escape of prisoner. IV. destruction of evidence.