Alfred was saddled with gambling debt and came up with a plan to pay it off. He called his friend, Betty, and proposed that she pretend to be a bear and destroy Alfred’s luxury car. Alfred planned on capturing the entire ordeal on his home security camera, which he would then submit to the insurance company and get paid. They agreed that Alfred would pay her $1,000.00 once he received the insurance proceeds. Alfred purchased a bear costume for Betty to wear. That night she showed up outside Alfred’s home in the bear costume, roared loudly, and then heavily damaged Alfred’s car, which was parked on the street in front of his home. Unfortunately, Alfred’s neighbor – Charles – couldn’t tell if the car was occupied. He then grabbed his rifle and, believing Betty was a bear who was about to kill anyone inside the vehicle, shot her dead. Distraught upon discovering that his friend was killed, Alfred changed his mind about submitting the insurance claim. This jurisdiction has adopted the common law, with modern distinctions where applicable. Should Alfred be charged with any crimes because of his agreement with Betty? Discuss. Should Alfred be charged with any theft crimes? Discuss. Should Alfred be charged with any homicide crimes? Discuss.

To show her concern for the “distress caused by gun violence” to which her city has been subjected, Paula, a protester, carried a United States flag upside down through the streets in a privately organized parade. At the conclusion of the parade, Paula was arrested under a state statute that provides, “Whoever publicly treats the United States flag contemptuously shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.” Paula’s conviction in the lower courts was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. The statute was not challenged on grounds that it violated Paula’s First Amendment rights.Assuming the statute had already been interpreted by the state supreme court to include Paula’s conduct and alleviate any claim the statute was vague, will the Court likely uphold the conviction?

A nurse is assessing a client with suspected systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Which finding is most indicative of this condition?

Big City condemned all of the buildings in a decaying warehouse district and offered them to developers at no cost, provided the developer submits a building revitalization plan to Big City’s planning commission, the commission approves the plan, and the developer pays Big City’s redevelopment authority to perform the work needed to revitalize the building. Edward, an experienced developer, submitted a plan to revitalize a block-long building, and his plan was approved by the planning commission. However, Edward wanted to perform the revitalization work himself, both to ensure that the job was done correctly and to save a substantial amount of money. Although he offered to post a surety bond to insure his performance, Big City refused his offer.As applied to the contractor, is Big City’s requirement that Edward use Big City’s redevelopment authority constitutional?

Pat was a librarian at Dell High School. Pat’s responsibilities included monitoring students assigned to study in the library, helping students find books, buying new books for the library, putting books back on shelves, and giving students research advice on how to proceed. As part of the book buying process Pat reads books the library might acquire while she is minding her desk and monitoring students. Among the books many she read at the desk this last semester and ultimately purchased for the library were Rosaria Butterfield’s Five Lies of Our Anti-Christian Age, (2023), Jerimiah Johnston’s The Jesus Discoveries; 10 historic Finds That Bring Us Face to Face With Jesus, (2026), C.S. Lewis’ Mere Christianity, an English version of Thomas Aquinas’ Treaties on Law from the Suma Theologica, an English translation of the Quran, The Complete works of William Shakespear, Confucius’ Analects in English, an English translation of the Buddhist folk classic The Journey to the West, and an English translation of the Jewish work The Babylonian Talmud. Pat read and rejected Michel Foucault’s The History of Sexuality, making a note that she considered it inappropriate for High School students without parental permission, and that she saw no reason to spend time and money seeking permission from parents. Three anonymous students complained to the principal and the school board about these choices, as well as getting the ACLU to write a letter to the school board stating that these choices constituted a violation of the separation of church and state. The district fired Pat, citing how her choices Dell High School vulnerable to expensive litigation. Pat produced records showing that except for the two books published recently, all of the other books had been on the collections of High School library’s in 28 states between 1838 and 1959, Records were not available for the holdings of the other states, or prior to 1838 as that was when the earlies High School libraries were established in the United States, Philadelphia’s being one of the first. How would you advise Pat on whether her reading at the desk or her choices were Constitutional? What arguments can be made for Pat and Dell concerning the First Amendment’s application to Pat’s actions?   

Intending to encourage long-time resident aliens to become American citizens, State T passed a law denying numerous state and municipal jobs to persons who had been resident aliens for longer than 10 years. Those already in State T had to apply for American citizenship within a year after the law took effect. Persons who had acquired resident alien status prior to achieving the age of majority had until age 30 to acquire such status or be automatically disqualified from obtaining such a job. A 40-year-old man who has been a resident alien in State T for 15 years applied for a job as a police emergency response telecommunications expert. He had not filed for citizenship within the one-year grace period.May State T constitutionally rely on the statute to refuse to hire the man?

Question-20

State O passed a statute requiring all employers in State O to provide a medical insurance plan for full-time employees. A State O trade association to which many state employers belong brought suit in federal court, asking the court to strike down the statute as unconstitutional. Assume that the State O statute is not preempted by any federal law.Which of the following best reflects the burden of persuasion in this case?

A client presents with sudden-onset wheezing, hypotension, and swelling of the lips. What is the nurse’s priority action?

Logan owned a large parcel of land that he divided into two equal parcels. Thirty years ago, Logan deeded the eastern parcel to Pat by warranty deed, including an easement over the south twenty-five feet of the western parcel for access to the navigable river that ran along the westerly boundary of the western parcel. Logan acknowledged the deed and easement, and Pat recorded the document. The recording officer maintains an alphabetical grantor–grantee index, but no tract index.Pat made no use of the easement until five years ago, one year after Nate, her neighbor, had purchased the western parcel from Logan. Nate had paid at least market value for the western parcel and was not aware of Pat’s easement. Nate objected to Pat’s use of the easement shortly after she began using it, but Pat paid no attention. Pat had reasonable access to a public highway on the easterly boundary of the eastern parcel. Nate sues Pat to quiet his title and to restrain Pat from using the easement over the western parcel.If Pat is successful, what is the likely reason?