GradePack

    • Home
    • Blog
Skip to content
bg
bg
bg
bg

Author Archives: Anonymous

What volume of a 10.00% (m/v) solution of sugar is needed to…

What volume of a 10.00% (m/v) solution of sugar is needed to provide 2.00g of sugar?  Show your work to get credits.  No credit is given if no work is shown.

Read Details

What is the mass (in gram) of 9.44 × 10^24 molecules of NO2?…

What is the mass (in gram) of 9.44 × 10^24 molecules of NO2? The molar mass of NO2 is 46.01 grams/mol. 1.0mol = 6.02 x 10^23 molecules.  Show your work to get credits.  No credit is given if no work is shown.

Read Details

The molar concentration [M] of H3O+ is 5.8 x 10^-9. The pH i…

The molar concentration [M] of H3O+ is 5.8 x 10^-9. The pH is

Read Details

Given the calculation: 4.238 x 9.1 = ? What is the answer re…

Given the calculation: 4.238 x 9.1 = ? What is the answer reported to the correct number of significant figures?

Read Details

Write a cohesive commentary that addresses all of the follow…

Write a cohesive commentary that addresses all of the following points: (9.1) Anscombe versus Truman. Anscombe says that choosing to kill the innocent as a means to one’s ends “is always murder.” Explain what makes her position absolutist, using her “boiling one baby” challenge. Why does she think Truman’s reasoning that the bombings shortened the war and saved lives is “not good enough”? Then explain what Rachels means by distinguishing “Truman was wrong” from “Truman violated an absolute rule.” (9.2) Hypothetical versus categorical. Explain Kant’s distinction between hypothetical and categorical imperatives, using your own example rather than the chess or SAT examples from the reading. Why does Kant think moral obligations must be categorical? How does that commitment push him toward the view that moral rules have no exceptions? (9.3) The maxim problem. Rachels says Kant’s first argument against lying has a flaw in step (2). Explain the flaw, using a maxim of your own to show how describing an act’s maxim more narrowly can change whether it passes the universalizability test. Does this flaw defeat the Categorical Imperative itself, or only Kant’s conclusion about lying? Defend your answer. (9.3) Responsibility for consequences. Explain Kant’s claim that a person who lies “must answer for the consequences” while a person who tells the truth does not. Summarize Rachels’s two objections. Then describe a new scenario, not from the reading, in which telling the truth might lead to harm, and show how Kant and Rachels would each analyze it. (9.4–9.5) Evaluation. Rachels argues that the Katrina dilemma shows that two rules cannot both be absolute, but that one still might be. Explain why he calls this argument “impressive but limited.” Then evaluate his proposal that we may break a rule only for a reason we would be willing for anyone else to accept in the same circumstances. Does this test permit too much, since people can rationalize almost anything as a reason? Use a specific example in your answer. Ch 9 Absolute Moral Rules Kant Rachels.pdf

Read Details

This is a sample question to see what the Honorlock-enabled…

This is a sample question to see what the Honorlock-enabled assessment is like. Choose answer A.

Read Details

Why is stability important in lean systems?

Why is stability important in lean systems?

Read Details

What is kaizen?

What is kaizen?

Read Details

What is the primary purpose of process measures?

What is the primary purpose of process measures?

Read Details

What is the primary purpose of process focus in lean thinkin…

What is the primary purpose of process focus in lean thinking?

Read Details

Posts pagination

Newer posts 1 … 35 36 37 38 39 … 100,545 Older posts

GradePack

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
Top