Imagine you are an employee for Camacho Designs (CD), which is involved in manufacturing remote controls for televisions. On this particular job, however, you have been assigned to infiltrate and sabotage the designs of Camacho’s arch-rival Estevez Futures (EF) new remote control. First, define semantic distance, and then give two ways you might sabotage EF’s designs by increasing the semantic distance involved in using their remote control. One of these two ways should sabotage the interface for novices, and the other should sabotage the interface for experts. Then, define articulatory distance, and then give one way you might sabotage EF’s designs by increasing the articulatory distance involved in using their remote control. Finally, assuming you were able to implement all three of your nefarious designs, describe the result in terms of direct engagement and invisible interfaces. Your description can be short, but make sure it reflects a correct understanding of both direct engagement and invisible interfaces. Note that there is no one single right answer to this question. There are many possible ways you might sabotage their designs, and many effects that sabotage might have. Our objective with this question is to evaluate whether the approaches you propose align with the corresponding notions of distance.

Imagine you are an employee for Camacho Designs (CD), which is involved in manufacturing controllers for video games. On this particular job, however, you have been assigned to infiltrate and sabotage the designs of Camacho’s arch-rival Estevez Futures (EF) new controller. First, define semantic distance, and then give two ways you might sabotage EF’s designs by increasing the semantic distance involved in using their controller. One of these two ways should sabotage the interface for novices, and the other should sabotage the interface for experts. Then, define articulatory distance, and then give one way you might sabotage EF’s designs by increasing the articulatory distance involved in using their controller. Finally, assuming you were able to implement all three of your nefarious designs, describe the result in terms of direct engagement and invisible interfaces. Your description can be short, but make sure it reflects a correct understanding of both direct engagement and invisible interfaces. Note that there is no one single right answer to this question. There are many possible ways you might sabotage their designs, and many effects that sabotage might have. Our objective with this question is to evaluate whether the approaches you propose align with the corresponding notions of distance.

According to the lecture, what is a software system that allows businesses to manage their interactions with customers through data analysis?

Define and give one real-world example of each of the following three principles:  Procedural learning (or knowledge) Haptic feedback Chunking Then, define the difference between recognition and recall. Provide one example of a real-world interface that expects the user to do more recall than recognition and explain what it expects the user to recall, and provide one example of a real-world interface that allows the user to do more recognition than recall and explain what it allows the user to recognize. If you have difficulty thinking of a real interface for either recognition or recall, you may describe a fictitious interface so long as your description is clear enough to identify whether it is emblematic of recognition or recall.

When a company uses a(n) _____________, it is using its own advertising staff to provide the promotional services needed by the company.

What is the definition of a creative brief mentioned in the lecture?

What is the CRM platform that was featured in a video in the lecture?

Which type of copy from the suspect disk to the target location does the simplest method of duplicating a disk drive make?

What is MFT?

Define and give one real-world example of each of the following three principles:  Declarative learning (or knowledge) Chunking Cognitive load Then, define the difference between recognition and recall. Provide one example of a real-world interface that expects the user to do more recall than recognition and explain what it expects the user to recall, and provide one example of a real-world interface that allows the user to do more recognition than recall and explain what it allows the user to recognize. If you have difficulty thinking of a real interface for either recognition or recall, you may describe a fictitious interface so long as your description is clear enough to identify whether it is emblematic of recognition or recall.