¶ I,  lines 75-77. Fielding was also charged with a crime because of what happened in paragraph A, line 14. Instead of contesting the charge, so that sentencing could proceed without the costs of a trial and avoiding the affect of a guilty plea in a subsequent civil action.What is the name for the plea Fielding entered?

¶ A, lines 4-5.  Chef Paul Liverpool, still bitter about the baking bruhaha going on in Peoria, sent letters to suppliers and customers of the Peoria Market, as shown in Exhibit 1. Liverpool would have a defense to any tort claim Fielding would bring against Liverpool if:

¶ A, line 14. In response Fielding punched Liverpool in the face and knocked a tooth out.Fielding could be charged with the crime of:

¶ C. line 31. Another driver, Walter Wayward, was driving drunk after drinking cherry vodka shots at PruBerrys.PruBerrys, having served Wayward to the point of intoxication, will be liable for damages caused because of:

¶ A, lines 7-8.  The combination of these letters … caused Fielding terrible stress including headaches and sleeplessness.Because of these additional facts,  Fielding would have a cause of action against Liverpool for the tort of:

¶ H, lines 72-74. After that March 1 appearance by Liverpool, the facts of this case were presented to a panel of 23 people from the community who also issued charges against Liverpool. The charge provided by that panel was presented to Liverpool at the next court appearance on April 1.What is the name for the panel discussed in this part of the fact pattern?

¶ H, lines 70-71. Liverpool refused the plea offer and the matter was set for further proceedings before the judge on April 1.What plea did Liverpool offer in this part of the fact pattern?

The questions that follow (until the general short answer questions that conclude the test) are based on the Unit 4 fact pattern. By answering yes to this question, you acknowledge that you have had the opportunity to read and review the Unit 4 fact pattern prior to this exam. If your answer is No, immediately exit the exam and contact Prof. Paulsen.

In the case of  Nikita A. Levy and the photos and videos of naked women discussed in class, the source of the standards violated by Nikita A. Levy were:

In the case of  Nikita A. Levy and the photos and videos of naked women discussed in class, the persons faced with the ethical dilemma were: