Legal Positivism’s critique of Natural Law contends that Natural Law produces indeterminacy disguised as private opinion.

A prime focus of Scandinavian Realism attacks metaphysical foundations of law.

Thomas’s basic directive of Natural law is:

Who, in describing the work of the legal scientist, described his task as being to “remove impurities” from the law:

Hart breaks with earlier legal positivists because not all law issues in commands; he labels these other types of laws as:

Which are incorrect beliefs in the United States about the poor? (Select All That Apply)

According to Hart, an ineffective rule may be valid if it stems from a “Rule of Recognition”

According to Olvercrona, law only exists in a factual sense.

The moral dilemmas facing judges in contrast to those facing lawyers are asymmetrical.

According to legal positivists, the main claims regarding the nature of law include The Discretion Thesis, The Separability Thesis, and