Plaintiff and Defendant are co-workers. Plaintiff sued Defendant for defamation after Defendant called Plaintiff a “no good embezzler” during a meeting at work. Plaintiff calls Alpha, who had attended the meeting at which Defendant made the statement, to repeat the statement Defendant made. The evidence is:

Defendant is charged with kidnapping Victim. Defendant claims that he is not guilty and offers a series of alibi witnesses who claim Defendant was with them at the time of the crime. In the kidnapping, Victim was bound with fishing line. The prosecution seeks to offer evidence that Defendant has twice previously been convicted of kidnapping and that the victims of those crimes were bound with fishing line. The evidence of the prior convictions is:

Defendant is charged is with the armed robbery of a convenience store. Alpha will testify that his wife, Beta, saw Defendant run out of the store after the robbery and immediately stated, “There goes Defendant with a gun in his hand!” Alpha’s testimony is:

In what aspects of stigma are symbolic interactionists interested?

Plaintiff was injured while working on a printing press manufactured by Defendant. Defendant prepared a report on the accident at the request of its insurance company and shared it with defense counsel. As part of its case in chief, Defendant seeks to introduce the report, as the report states that the printing press was in good working order at the time of the incident. Plaintiff’s attorney objects. The report is:

The doctor orders Morphine Sulfate 5 mg IV every 3 hours as needed for pain. The Morphine Sulfate that is stocked on your nursing unit is labeled 8 mg per 2 mL.  How many mL will you give?

Defendant is charged with attempted murder. As her first witness, Defendant calls Alpha to testify that Defendant is a good neighbor. Alpha’s testimony is:

In a trademark infringement suit between Plaintiff and Defendant, Defendant sought to introduce a business record. Plaintiff claimed the document was made for the purposes of litigation and therefore did not qualify under the exception. Which of the following is the most appropriate way for the issue to be decided?

Three days after Alpha and Defendant robbed a bank, Defendant saw Alpha exit a car with a uniformed police officer inside. Alpha walked up to Defendant and stated, “Wow, I still cannot believe we robbed that bank!” Defendant said nothing. Defendant is charged with bank robbery, and Alpha will testify for the prosecution in return for a reduction of his sentence. At trial, Alpha testifies to the interaction, and defense counsel objects. The objection should be:

Plaintiff is the editor of a newspaper. Defendant posted an essay on a website that stated Plaintiff was “an unethical cheat” because Plaintiff wrote editorials for the paper without disclosing his financial interest in the subject matter of the editorial. Plaintiff sued Defendant for defamation and Defendant defended on the grounds of truth. After Plaintiff testified that he was not an unethical cheat, Defendant called Alpha as a witness. Alpha testified that Plaintiff accepted a bribe to write a positive editorial. Plaintiff’s lawyer objects. The testimony should be: