In 2025, Prosecutor Patti was elected as Hawthorne County Prosecutor. Within a month of her election, she is approached by the Exoneration Society of the local law school claiming that it has evidence that Joe Blue, a prisoner in the state prison, was wrongfully convicted. Patti reviews Joe Blue’s file and learns that he was convicted by her predecessor as Hawthorne County Prosecutor, Pete. Pete has since retired. Pete obtained a conviction of Joe Blue in 2022 for arson. Patti obtains Joe Blue’s initial prosecution file from the archives and reviews it. Patti also reviews the Exoneration Society’s evidence and agrees that it is new, credible, and material. The evidence convinces Patti that it is reasonably likely Joe Blue did not commit the crime for which he was convicted. Still, Patti is not confident enough to say that she knows Joe Blue is innocent or even that she could prove his innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. She is also wary of acting contrary to her mandate from the electorate to be tough on crime. Under the Model Rules, what is Prosecutor Patti’s obligation?  I. Disclose the evidence to the appropriate authority/court; II. Disclose the information to the defendant;  III. Undertake further investigation or cause such an investigation to be launched; IV.  Seek to remedy the conviction.

Attorney is a busy litigator whose practice has recently become even busier, and they have only been able to render 20 hours of pro bono representation this past year. Is Attorney subject to discipline?

Attorney met with a potential new client this morning, Robby Pardue. Pardue seeks counsel to represent him in a claim against his former employer, Jaffe Corp., for libel. Attorney begins the client intake interview by asking Pardue for a list of the entities and individuals involved. Attorney then takes a break in the initial consultation to run a conflict check, which reveals that Attorney’s firm represents Jaffe Corp. as its labor counsel in a number of discrimination cases. Which of these is true under the Model Rules?

Attorney A and Associate work together at a law firm with A (a partner) directly supervising Associate. One day A is approached by Greg, who has a multi-million dollar discrimination case against his employer. A delegates the representation to Associate who has experience with this kind of litigation. Associate interviews Greg in great depth and decides to take the case. During his intake interview Associate discovers that Greg’s employer uses the firm annually for year-end legal tax advice as well as occasional mid-year tax opinions. Associate decides that the different subject matters remove any potential conflict, and he will order the screening of the tax lawyer at the firm who knows about Greg’s employer’s tax information. Associate prepares and executes a retainer letter with Greg, orders the screening, and files a complaint in Greg’s case. That same day, Greg’s employer immediately files a motion to disqualify Associate and files a bar discipline complaint against him. Who is subject to discipline?

Attorney practices pro bono one Saturday a month at the free legal aid clinic run by a local non-profit. Attorney’s services are given on a one-time-only basis, and all clients are informed that the lawyer will not represent the client beyond the single Saturday meeting. Last Saturday, Attorney represented Brennan Mulligan in drafting a complaint against his employer. Attorney’s law firm currently represents Mulligan’s employer in a number of ongoing cases. Which of the following best describes Attorney’s responsibilities under the Model Rules?

Attorney represented Riker in a products liability lawsuit against Corporation. Riker suffered terrible injuries that will leave him debilitated for the rest of his life as a result of a manufacturing defect in one of Corporation’s products. Attorney has repeatedly threatened to find other plaintiffs who were similarly injured like Riker and bring a very public class action lawsuit against Corporation. While it has not moved Corporation to settlement, Attorney can tell they are concerned. Riker is reluctant to talk about his injury and future debilitated life in discovery or at trial. Because he believes it is in the client’s best interest, Attorney calls Corporation’s counsel and offers that if Corporation will meet Riker’s last settlement demand, he will refrain from bringing any future claims against Corporation or disclosing any of the information obtained during discovery. Corporation’s counsel considers the offer for two days but calls back to say that Corporation declines and will take its chances at trial. Who is subject to discipline?

Attorney is working very late one night drafting a complicated contract in a telecommunications licensing deal. Attorney is tired, stressed out, and lost about how to draft some of the contract provisions. Taking a break to get more coffee, Attorney runs into the law firm’s general counsel (GC) who is also working late. GC can sense Attorney’s obvious exhaustion and nervousness. GC asks Attorney what’s got him in so late and seeming so troubled. Attorney explains that he’s in over his head on this telecommunications matter and doesn’t want to look like an idiot by getting it wrong, but there doesn’t seem to be any clear answer. Attorney also says that he has serious impostor syndrome, perpetually second-guessing whether he is a capable lawyer or just lucky no one has detected his incompetence. The GC says she can’t help on the substantive issue because that’s way outside her expertise, but she understands imposter syndrome. She confesses that back in the day she always felt so behind all her law school peers, so she fabricated part of her bar application by inventing a fake internship and a fake journal membership for her employment record. Ever since, GC has wondered whether her entire practice is based on claims of experience she never actually had. In regard to GC’s bar admission, which of the following must Attorney do to avoid being subject to discipline?

Attorney represents a client in a property dispute over ownership of a dog, originally co-owned by the client and her ex-boyfriend. Attorney is concerned that her client is becoming increasingly angry over this dispute. The client’s language regarding her ex-boyfriend has become more pointed lately. Attorney thinks it is possible that client might kill or grievously harm her ex-boyfriend or herself. Which of the following accurately describes Attorney’s Model Rules obligation:

Attorney is defending a local business, Apollo Beer Tours, in a defamation suit brought by Dominique Abra. Almost a year after the lawsuit was filed and well into discovery in the case, Attorney schedules the deposition of Ms. Abra. When they arrive at the deposition, Attorney and Ms. Abra instantly recognize each other. Attorney previously represented Ms. Abra, who was then going by her maiden name, Dominique Du. Attorney represented her in defending a fraud claim regarding the same conduct now at issue in the defamation case. Attorney accurately identifies the conflict this represents and the ongoing rule violation that would occur from continuing this representation of Apollo Beer Tours against Ms. Abra. Attorney is now drafting a motion to withdraw to submit to the court. Which of the following is true under the Model Rules?

Attorney represents a client in a contentious contract dispute. Late one evening, she receives an email from opposing counsel that appears to be an evaluation of the case and some proposed settlement offers and arguments. The email is addressed to the opposing party, not Attorney. What must Attorney do to comply with the Model Rules?