What is the long-run effect of immigration on capital use in the receiving country?

(Figure: Home and Foreign Autarky Equilibria) H-O S and C.jpg  If shoes are a labor-intensive industry, which nation is labor abundant?

Immigration(1).jpg Refer to Figure: Immigration. Assume initially home country (H) is at point A* and foreign country (F) is at point A. Workers in H and F are allowed to move and work in another country. Which of the following is correct?

Which of the following is NOT an explanation of Leontief’s paradox?

Consider a hypothetical economy in which only computers and shoes are produced and in which computer production is capital intensive compared with shoe production. If two resources are being used, labor and capital, then any increase in immigration in the long run:

In the short-run (specific-factors) model, foreign direct investment is expected to cause a(n) ________in the production of the capital-intensive good and a(n) ________in the production of the land-intensive good in the receiving country.

Which of the following is one conclusion of the Heckscher-Ohline model?

In the Heckscher–Ohlin Model, as trade occurs in a capital-abundant country, increased imports will force domestic import-competing firms to decrease price and production. Labor and capital will move to exporting firms. What will then happen to wages and returns to capital?

(Figure: Home and Foreign Autarky Equilibria) H-O S and C(1).jpg According to the shapes of the two PPFs, which nation has a comparative advantage in the production of computers?

Latvia.jpg Refer to the above table. According to the Heckscher–Ohlin model, Latvia’s capital–labor ratios are consistent with: