As proof that C went to New Orleans on Tuesday, B proffers evidence that on Monday B said, “Tomorrow I’m going to New Orleans with C.”  How should the trial court rule?

Criminal prosecution for aggravated assault by the defendant against his former business partner, who is also a former police officer. Defendant seeks to exclude admission of an Instagram post on the defendant’s Instagram account. Specifically, the defendant posted multiple visually beautiful and technically sophisticated music videos by an up-and-coming local rap artist that contains lyrics that celebrated the vicious killing of police officers. When posting the videos on his Instagram account, the defendant commented/captioned immediately beneath the videos: “Love this!”  The government seeks to admit the videos and song lyrics against the defendant. What is the strongest basis for admissibility?

Same facts as #1. The government seeks to introduce evidence that Midori’s dog is named “Executioner.”  Defense counsel objects. What is the strongest basis for the objection? 

Second degree murder trial. The dog owned by defendant Midori is alleged to have attacked and killed Diane. The dog’s breed tends to be exceptionally large (weighing over 100 pounds and reaching over five feet tall when standing on its hind legs). The government’s theory of the case is that Midori’s criminal recklessness in keeping such an animal in a residential neighborhood constituted a substantial and unjustifiable risk to human life, one that a law-abiding person in the same situation would not take. Midori pleads “not guilty.” The prosecution now seeks to introduce the following anonymously typed statement, found on a sheet of paper, taped on the outside of Midori’s front door: “I used to work for a breeder of this kind of dog; I remember that it is an extraordinarily vicious breed; it is only used for combat and fighting.” Defense counsel objects. What is the strongest basis for the objection? 

Civil felony fraud litigation. Y sued X for breach of promise to marry. To prove that X and Y are engaged, Y calls Z, a close friend, to testify that Z heard X ask Y, “will you marry me?” and Y answered “yes.” X’s counsel objects and moves to strike Z’s testimony.  What result?

Akamu, an opioid drug dealer, was shot. Akamu accused Hector of shooting him. However, there was insufficient evidence to prosecute Hector. Three months later, Akamu was shot again. As he was being wheeled into surgery, a police lieutenant told Akamu: “You may not live. You should tell me who shot you.”  Akamu calmly replied: “Same as last time, Hector.” Akamu lapsed into a coma after surgery and died two months later of an infection. The government now decides to prosecute Hector for Akamu’s death. At Hector’s murder trial, the government seeks to introduce Akamu’s statement to the police lieutenant. Defense counsel objects. What is the defendant’s strongest basis to exclude the evidence?

Use scenarios build upon ___________.

Operational requirements of a system include all the following, except:

Testing philosophy suggests which of the following?

A lot of the ‘unfreeze’ part of the three step model for managing organization change…