In a negligence case against Dr. Roberts, an expert witness for the plaintiff provided testimony that Dr. Roberts did not practice in a manner that other physicians with similar training and experience would have practiced. The judge allowed the expert witness’ testimony to be admitted because it demonstrated lack of adherence to the standard of care.  What term is associated with the standard of care?

Janice arrives at her physician’s office for her 10:30 scheduled appointment and pays her office visit copayment. Her physician examines her. Based on these facts, Janice’s consent is 

Below is data for the particulate matter emissions for high-altitude vehicles. Interval (g/gal) Frequency 1 to < 3 [a] 3 to < 5 [b] 5 to < 7 [c] 7 to < 9 7 9 to < 11 3 11 to < 15 5 15 to < 25 4   The proportion of vehicles in the sample with emissions between 3 and 7 grams is (on decimal form, i.e. between 0 and 1).  

For the following data points,  64.30,  64.34,  62.20,  61.16,  66.50 Calculate the sample mean and sample median.

The median is the [percentile]-th percentile of a data set.

From which plot is it easiest to visualize the interquartile range?

You may click on the following links and open in a new tab in your browser. Do not open in another application, such as Adobe Acrobat. Formula Sheet R Commands R Snippet: https://rdrr.io/snippets/ Wolfram Alpha: https://www.wolframalpha.com/  

What type of discharge must the veteran have to qualify for burial benefits?

Everyone has beliefs and opinions. The philosopher must question these things:

Essay Section 2: (Answer ALL parts of this essay) Worth 26 points.   1. In your own words fully explain Anselm’s Ontological argument for God’s existence step by step. How exactly is it that he thinks he can prove that an ACTUAL God exists from just the mere IDEA of God? Explain the logical thought process of this argument step by step and in detail. (You may bring Descartes’ Ontological Argument into this if you want). Make sure you illustrate your points with your own examples.  As part of your explanation, make sure to explain why the Ontological Argument can be used with the idea of God, but NOT with something like the “perfect ice-cream cone”.   2. How does this sort of argument differ from an a posteriori approach like the Cosmological or Teleological arguments? As part of your explanation, explain: Why is it possible to come up with something like the Ontological Argument for God’s existence (but not the Cosmological or Teleological Arg.), if you existed as only a mind with no sense experiences (and a physical world did NOT exist)?   3. Explain in your own words and in detail BOTH of Kant’s criticisms to the Ontological Argument that “Existence is not a predicate”. Make sure you fully explain exactly how these criticisms affect the Ontological argument. Give your own examples.