Who said this? 

Acute infective endocarditis presents quickly and is dangerous. What are some features of Acute Infective Endocarditis? Select all that apply.

What’s one way to summarize the Modigliani-Miller theorem? 

Economists often like to use the “90-10 ratio” as a way to summarize the variability, the diversity, the inequality of outcomes that exist in a dataset. The 90-10 ratio is the 90th percentile value divided by the 10th percentile for a particular variable. It’s a useful alternative to the standard deviation, though both have their place. The 90-10 ratio almost always eliminates the extreme outliers from the data, which are often data errors or special cases anyway, so it helps us to focus on the big issues. Also, it’s just clear what the number means.  For the Penn Data you used in the Solow Homework, the 90-10 ratio for GDP per capita is 25 (not 25%, 25x!), and the 90-10 ratio of capital per worker is 55 (not 55%, 55x!). Use productivity levels accounting to report how much incomes per capita differ solely due to differences in capital per worker if alpha has the conventional value of 1/3. Be within 1 of the correct answer. Just answer with a number, no “X” and certainly not a “%”.  You can think of this as a ceteris paribus exercise if you like: “If countries all had the same TFP, and only differed in capital per worker, the 90th percentile of countries would have incomes per capita ____ times as rich as the 10th percentile of countries.” You’ll get the right answer that way, and it’s a useful approach.  But really, as a productivity accounting exercise, what you’re doing is answering this question: “If I explained all differences in income as either caused by differences in TFP or by differences in capital per worker, what’s the effect of this 55X difference in capital between the 90th and the 10th percentile of countries on the 90-10 income ratio?”

Two people, Cat and Dog, each start their lives with an income of 100, and they don’t discount the future (beta = 1). Life lasts, alas, only two periods, and they can borrow or save at the interest rate of 100% per period–so hypothetically, if they only consumed in the future, they could consume a total of 200 in the future.  Cat’s utility function is square root [c0.5], and Dog’s utility function is natural log [ln(c)]. Like everyone else, they try to maximize their lifetime utility subject to their budget constraint.  Who will consume more in the future, Cat or Dog? 

Freelandia behaves according to Baby Solow. In Freelandia, the savings rate is always 40% of GDP, the depreciation rate is always 10% of the capital stock, and the production function is Y = K0.2. What is the steady-state capital output ratio in Freelandia? Answer with a number between 0 and 10.

Around 2010, nominal GDP in the U.S. was about $15 trillion. Using data provided (indirectly) in GLS, how many trillions of dollars was the value of the U.S. capital stock around 2010? Answer in trillions of dollars, with a number between 0 and 1000. Be within 10 (trillion dollars) of the right answer. [Aside: The value you’re calculating for this question is equipment investment, so it excludes the value of housing. FYI, physical housing in the U.S., ignoring the value of land in the U.S., is worth around $15 trillion.]

A consumer can borrow or lend freely at the market interest rate of r=100% per period. [If it’s helpful, think of the “period” as being a few decades.]  Her utility function is: U = ln(ct) + (1/2)ln(ct+1) She earns Yt=100 and Yt+1=100. But in period t+1 she will have to pay a tax of Tt+1=40.  If she’s maximizing her utility function subject to the IBC, how much will she consume in period t? 

According to recent research, roughly what percentage of attitudes toward trust persists to fourth-generation immigrant, on average? [Omit the percentage symbol in your answer: Just give a number]

In the traditional Keynesian model, what happens to GDP (Y) and consumption (C) when government purchases (G) rise?