Please read the following scenario: Imagine a researcher nam…
Please read the following scenario: Imagine a researcher named Olivia from an RST department. She studies risky leisure behaviors and hopes to learn about alcohol consumption among adolescents. To do this, she will study adolescents who have experienced binge drinking, their teachers, and/or their parents. Olivia’s supervisors are Professors Larson and Kim. These fictitious professors demonstrate two very different approaches to her study. Professor Larson believes that one strength of the research is that engages with people’s subjectivity and that Olivia should be transparent about her own subjectivity to enable readers to make judgments about it. Professor Larson advises Olivia that she will be recording and studying multiple perspectives, descriptions, interactions, and the dynamic way in which people bring issues and problems to life by talking about them or acting around them. Professor Kim’s beliefs are very different. He argues that Olivia’s proper task is to understand the reality of alcohol consumption among adolescents in a way that is as generalizable as possible. Professor Kim believes that Olivia can access participants’ real beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge: that Olivia can, for example, elucidate the essence of the experience of alcohol consumption or that she can determine what teenagers believe about drinking risks by measuring them. Professor Kim disagrees with Professor Larson’s position about subjectivity and transparency in research; in contrast, he strongly advises Olivia to avoid introducing bias and thus inaccuracy to her study. Please answer the following questions: What are the philosophical worldviews that represent each professor’s beliefs? (2 points) Identify a worldview with which you are most comfortable as a researcher. Explain your reasoning and discuss if your worldview is aligned with your group’s research design (5 points).
Read Details