16. The “zoot suit” riots of 1943:A.  were a series of fashion shows in Hollywood.B. involved Mexican immigrants fighting with blacks in Los Angeles.C. involved autoworkers in Detroit.D. highlighted the limits of racial tolerance during World War II.E. highlighted the growing acceptance of Mexicans in southern California.

6. The radio broke the silence of the American home with sports, music and drama shows.

9. Speculation made many investors risk capital in companies with questionable future revenue potential.

32. As the Depression raged on, Americans attempted to appear unaffected by their economic woes. Examples of this behavior were the practice of appearing employed husbands taking “business trips” and secretly retailoring adult clothes for their children. A. Americans were unfazed by their dilemma. B. Americans did not need mass produced possessions to enjoy life. C. Poverty was considered shameful. D. None of these.

What constitutes substantial performance depends on the circumstances of each case.

A makes a contract with B, whereby A promises to pay B $10.00 if B promises to cut A’s grass. After making the contract, A decides he really doesn’t need his grass cut, so he arranges to transfer B’s obligation to “cut grass” to C. Which of the following is true:

Generally, minors may disaffirm their contracts at any time during their minority or up to a reasonable time after reaching the age of majority.

If Alfredo, a minor, buys a used car from “Good Carma” Pre-Owned Cars, LLC, the parties have a void contract.

Cornelis, the owner of Preferable Purchase Electronics, Incorporated, orders 100 stereo receivers from Marcela, a salesperson for Dulcet Sound Manufacturing Company. Cornelis has made a promise to pay for the receivers in exchange for Dulcet Sound’s promise to deliver them. This is a(n) ________ contract.

Timko served on the board of trustees for a local school. During his service as a trustee, he recommended that the school purchase a building. To induce the other trustees to vote in favor of the purchase, he promised to help pay for the building in the event the school could not afford to purchase it. Timko agreed that at the end of five years, if the school could not afford to purchase the building, he would pay to the school or on its behalf the purchase price less the down payment. At the end of four years, Timko died. At the end of five years, the school could not afford to purchase the building. The  school sued Timko’s estate in attempt to recover the amount of Timko’s promise. Timko’s estate successfully defended the school’s contract claim on a basis of lack of consideration. A. Since the Estate successfully defended the breach of contract claim is there any alternative remedy that the school can assert to recover against Timko or his estate for the promise made by Timko? (5 Points). B. For the alternative remedy(s) identified in your answer above in subsection “A”, set out in detail what the school will need to prove or the elements associated with your theory of an alternative remedy that may be available to the school. (10 Points)  C. Describe how your alternative remedy would apply to the facts set forth above.  Please give your analysis as to how the rule of your alternative remedy would apply to the facts in the question. (10 Points).