17.  Shopkeeper, the owner of a small dress shop, fired Cashier, saying to other people in the store, “I just saw Cashier steal $100 by taking $200 in payment for a dress and ringing up the dress as if it were a $100 item.” Cashier sued Shopkeeper for slander. Evidence at trial shows that the dress in question cost $178, that Cashier rang up a $98 tab on the register, and that Cashier thus stole $80. Assuming that Shopkeeper is shown to have had the required mental state, may Cashier recover?

25. Roger and Lucas are neighbors. There is no fence separating their backyard lots. One night both of them were sitting on their respective porches drinking beers. Roger, in particular, got quite drunk. Lucas yelled something at Roger that made Roger mad, so Roger walked over and punched Lucas in the face. Lucas, who had had a few drinks himself, saw the punch coming and was afraid, but he was too slow to get out of the way. Roger did no damage to Lucas’s land. Which of the following is most accurate?

PART I: MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS  (One Hour – 30 Questions) Select the best answer out of the available choices.1. Anthony goes to a home improvement store and asks to speak with a specialist on particular weed killers. Anthony makes it clear to the specialist that he will buy whatever product is recommended. The specialist selects a certain product for Anthony without further discussion. Relying on the specialist’s recommendation, Anthony buys the product. However, the product does not kill the type of weeds that grow in his yard. Anthony wants to sue the store because he didn’t get the weed killer he needed. Which of the following product liability theories is Anthony’s best chance of recovery?

12.  A waitress was opening a bottle of a popular soft drink to serve to a customer when the bottle broke into two jagged pieces and inflicted a deep and long cut on her hand that severed blood vessels, nerves and the muscles in her thumb and palm. She later had to have several operations to restore use of and feeling in the hand. In a lawsuit against the manufacturer, the waitress alleged negligence and strict liability in tort, but found it difficult to prove the nature of the defect. She presented several witnesses familiar with the fact that some of the bottles would explode, but the cause was unknown. She proved that she did nothing wrong with the bottle and that it remained in the same condition as when it left the manufacturer’s plant. She also proved by expert testimony that there were tests that the manufacturer performs or can perform on the bottles to give a fairly fool-proof determination whether the bottle is safe. The defendant moved for summary judgment for failure to prove a defect and failure to show causation. What legal theory can the plaintiff rely on to establish liability in this kind of a situation where there is no indication of any carelessness by the plaintiff?

Which of the following represents the correct order of cellular respiration stages?

In one sentence, define what a covalent bond is (in terms of electrons).

A transverse plane results in which of the following directional terms:

In the reaction shown above, which of the the atoms/molecules are the substrates (reactants)?

List 2 components of nucleotides.

The final shape of a protein is its ______ structure, while the alpha helix and beta sheet are the _______ structure.