¶ L, line 88-90. Because Nadiya was such an important employee, Pru and the Worker Protection Insurance Company entered into a disability insurance contract, such that if anything should happen to Nadiya while at work, the insurance would pay for any injuries and lost wages, and for any property damage. Could the promises to pay be verbal instead of in writing?

¶ B, lines 20-21. Seeing the ad, Fielding sent Keller Station an email saying, “I would like Suite 104 and 104A at the rent of $17 per square feet for two (2) years.”Can Fielding enforce a contract for Suite 104 and 104A at the rent of $40 per square feet for two (2) years?

How are legal remedies different than equitable remedies?

¶ C, lines 29-30.  If Keller Station was able to find a new tenant for the location as of January 1, 2021, the day after the Market moved out of Suite 104, Keller Station may still be entitled to:

¶ J, lines 73-75. If this contract between PruBerrys and Nadiya is allowed, it will be enforceable if the terms of the agreement are reasonable in: (a) [Groupa]; and (b) [Groupb].

¶ N. If the court rules that there was a mistake of fact by both Peter and Pru in this contract, then the contract is:

¶ B. If it turned out that Keller Station had no spaces available for $17-$44.57 per square foot as stated in the ad (see Exhibit A), Keller Station could be subject to prosecution under consumer protection laws for:

¶ K, lines 83-86. Nadiya wanted to marry Rahul, but he was wealthy and wanted to protect his assets just in case the marriage with Nadiya did not work out. After some counseling with a lawyer, Nadiya and Rahul made an oral agreement prior to marriage covering how their property is to be managed during the marriage, and if there would be a divorce.What type of agreement is this?

¶ D and the email dated May 23 (Exhibit B-1) which says: I promise to present it to you in three weeks, on Monday June 13 at 8 am.¶ F, lines 43-45. Pru was upset that Peter was two hours late and thought about cancelling the arrangement again, but decided not to.  If Pru had tried to cancel the contract at this point, what would Peter’s strongest legal argument be that there was a valid contract?

¶ D and in the email dated May 23 (Exhibit B-1) which says: If I don’t hear from you within the next 24 hours, I’ll go forward with the assumption we have an agreement.What is your legal conclusion on a contract to construct a prototype?