¶ N. If the court rules that there was a mistake of fact by both Peter and Pru in this contract, then the contract is:

¶ B. If it turned out that Keller Station had no spaces available for $17-$44.57 per square foot as stated in the ad (see Exhibit A), Keller Station could be subject to prosecution under consumer protection laws for:

¶ K, lines 83-86. Nadiya wanted to marry Rahul, but he was wealthy and wanted to protect his assets just in case the marriage with Nadiya did not work out. After some counseling with a lawyer, Nadiya and Rahul made an oral agreement prior to marriage covering how their property is to be managed during the marriage, and if there would be a divorce.What type of agreement is this?

¶ D and the email dated May 23 (Exhibit B-1) which says: I promise to present it to you in three weeks, on Monday June 13 at 8 am.¶ F, lines 43-45. Pru was upset that Peter was two hours late and thought about cancelling the arrangement again, but decided not to.  If Pru had tried to cancel the contract at this point, what would Peter’s strongest legal argument be that there was a valid contract?

¶ D and in the email dated May 23 (Exhibit B-1) which says: If I don’t hear from you within the next 24 hours, I’ll go forward with the assumption we have an agreement.What is your legal conclusion on a contract to construct a prototype?

¶ C, lines 29-30. Keller Station was suing for rent due from Jan. 1, 2021 (the day after the Market was closed) to May 31, 2021, the last day of the lease.Which remedy is available to Keller Station, the landlord?

¶ M, lines 98-101.  The unfortunate events in Ukraine in February 2022 most likely provides YMCU with an excuse for nonperformance of its contractual obligation to provide mushrooms to PruBerrys.  What is that contractual defense?

¶ N. We have a contract interpretation issue here. A judge, ruling on what the contract meant, would use these tools of contract interpretation in what order (first to last)?

¶ A, lines 11-12.  Fielding responded, saying there would be an agreement, but only if a title search on the building came back with no liens.This is a valid contract, but with a

¶ G. Regarding Peter’s offer to manufacture one machine, and Pru’s acceptance by email and attempt to “unaccept.”Is there a valid contract for Peter to manufacture?