¶ L, lines 101-103. Pru would have preferred financing through a bank but unfortunately in 2010 Pru had previously submitted false financial statements to the local bank, and once that was discovered, the bank declined to to business with Pru ever again.Pru could have been charged with the crime of:

¶ B, lines 26-27. Fielding was upset, reached behind the counter for a gun, went to the door and fired a shot toward a fleeing Liverpool.If Fielding’s pointed the gun at Liverpool as he was running away, killing Liverpool, Fielding could be sued by the estate of Liverpool for the tort of:

This ends the questions based primarily on the Unit 4 fact pattern. The remaining questions are general Unit 4 questions. Choose yes or no to proceed (either is accepted, no points are given).

¶ K, lines 88-89. While in the hospital, Nadiya was visited by a therapy dog. (See Exhibit 5.) Unfortunately, an orderly pushing a cart ran over the dog’s tail causing the dog to nip Nadiya’s nose.Under tort law, which is true about liability of the dog’s owner as to Nadiya’s injury caused by the dog bite/nip?

¶ K, lines 90-91. While in the hospital … Things got even worse when the therapy monkey came to visit Nadiya’s hospital bed for reasons you may recall from the video played in class. (See Exhibit 6.)Under tort law, which is true about liability of the dog’s owner as to Nadiya’s injury caused by the dog bite/nip?

When professional hockey first came to the United States, many spectators injured by flying hockey pucks sued and recovered for negligence. But as time went on and spectators came to realize that attending a hockey game meant that one might occasionally be exposed to a flying hockey puck, courts began to allow the defendant owners of hockey teams were no longer liable to injured spectators. This explains the defense to negligence of: 

¶ L, lines 106-107. Pru also considered issuing stock, but the Securities and Exchange Commission did not approve of her proposed Initial Public Offering (IPO) because of those same financial statements.  If Pru had been caught doing this, she could have been charged with the crime of:

If a government entity entices persons to commit crimes by suggesting and inducing criminal acts to take place, the criminal defendant may be able to assert the defense of:

¶ C, lines 31-35. Another driver, Walter Wayward, was driving drunk after drinking cherry vodka shots at PruBerrys. Wayward was easily distracted by all the activity, and Wayward crashed his vehicle into the old Manias Manor building that was being prepared for demolition. (See Exhibit xx.) Because there was no fencing around that building, once Wayward hit the building, bricks easily fell upon Wayward’s car causing much more damage than if Wayward had hit a “regular building.” Because of the extensive damage to Wayward’s car, Wayward decides to sue the owner of Manias Manor and the demolition crew.   If there is any damage resulting from the demolition of the Manias Manor building, the demolition crew would be:

¶ I,  lines 75-77. Fielding was also charged with a crime because of what happened in paragraph A, line 14. Instead of contesting the charge, so that sentencing could proceed without the costs of a trial and avoiding the affect of a guilty plea in a subsequent civil action.What is the name for the plea Fielding entered?