Jack and Jill were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of an empty lot. Because neither of them had any paper with them, Jack wrote the following on a napkin: “Jill agrees to purchase from Jack, the lot located at 1643 Chippewa Way, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 for the price of $50,000.” Jill signed the napkin, although Jack did not sign it. Later, Jill refuses to pay for the land. If Jack sues Jill for specific performance of the contract, the most likely result is:

Ava sued Neil alleging breach of contract. According to Ava, Neil breached a contract he entered into with her before their marriage concerning his support of her and their division of property in the event of a divorce. Neil will most likely win this lawsuit if he can show that:

Sally is a student at the University of Maryland, College Park. She lives on campus and one of the street lights near her front door is out. The lack of light at night makes it difficult to see walking up the steps to her residence. Sally is also worried about the danger of potential criminals lurking by the door. She has contacted the university several times and they have promised to fix the light, but no one has done so. After several weeks, Sally hires a private contractor who fixes the light. She pays him $500. If the school refuses to reimburse her and forces her to sue:

Manny promises his colleagues that he will stop smoking cigars in the office if they promise to pay him $1000. His colleagues agree to pay the $1000 if he stops. Assume that there is no law that bans smoking cigars in the workplace. Manny quits smoking cigars, but his coworkers refuse to pay. Manny’s best argument is:

Considering all the kinds of invasion of privacy, which of the following is least likely to create liability?

Influential Civil Codes include the following except:  

To begin a lawsuit, a plaintiff must:  

William was riding his bicycle on a paved bike path and had an accident with another cyclist. William’s $1000 bicycle was destroyed in the accident.  He sues.  If the jury determined that William was 60 percent at fault and the other cyclist was 40 percent at fault under which doctrines would William be entitled to recover $400 from the other cyclist?  

Which of the following is true about forum selection clauses?

Peremptory challenges: