Which of the following best exemplifies a project governance metric?

What is the benefit of a governance stage gate?

If a faculty member accuses a student of an academic integrity violation and proposes an academic sanction, the student

A faculty member can recommend a grade of XF to appear on the student’s transcript (indicating an academic integrity violation), but only the College Academic Integrity Committee can actually impose that particular sanction. 

If a student is found responsible for an academic integrity violation in a course, the student is subject to academic sanctions imposed by the faculty member (as well as possible administrative sanctions). In addition, there are other automatic consequences of any AI violation in a course. Which of the following are automatic consequences of an AI violation in a course? Check all that apply.

Carlos and Max are lab partners in EE 210. In the EE 210 lab, students work together in groups of two to conduct the lab experiments and gather data, but are expected to submit individual lab reports. During the lab, Carlos forgets to write down some of the measurements that he and Max take. When he starts to write his lab report, he realizes this error and asks Max to email him the measurements. He then uses these measurements to complete the data analysis part of his lab report. Is this an academic integrity violation?

In EE 210, Wei uses ChatGPT to find out the general algorithm for solving circuits using Nodal Analysis. He then uses this information to complete their EE 210 homework, but does not ask for specific answers to a specific circuit. Is this an AI violation?

If a student is found responsible for an academic integrity violation, are the student’s parents notified?

Fatima accidentally overhears the CMPSC 473 professor tell his colleague that he is going to reuse the Fall 2007 CMPSC 473 exam because he doesn’t have enough time to make up a new exam. Fatima tells John, who is taking CMPSC 473, this information. John immediately looks for the Fall 2007 exam in his fraternity’s exam bank and uses it to prepare for the exam. Is this an academic integrity violation?

In Professor Lopez’s version of CMPSC 131, students are allowed to discuss concepts and ideas with each other, but they must write their own computer code for graded evaluative events, they may not share computer code for graded evaluative events with each other, and they must disclose any collaborations for graded evaluative events. Mohammed and Kareem are friends who are both taking Professor Lopez’s CMPSC 131 course. Mohammed was out sick part of the week, and was behind on getting that week’s assignment done. Mohammed asks Kareem if they could see Kareem’s code to help get them started with the assignment. Kareem agrees, and sends Mohammed their computer code. Has an academic integrity violation occurred under the course academic integrity policy?