First, define the three types of capacity – 1) cognitive, 2) moral, and 3) volitional. Then explain whether YOU THINK Andrea Yates exhibited each type of capacity.  Finally, explain whether YOU THINK Andrea should have been found NGRI according to Section 8.01 of the Texas Penal Code. Your opinion about NGRI should incorporate any relevant types of capacity.

Explain whether JP Miller is a paranoid, emotionally dependent coercive controller or a cold and calculating coercive controller.  First, I recommend defining both types of coercive controllers and then providing a clear explanation with specific examples from the case.  You should also state why you think the other category is NOT a good fit for JP’s behavior.  You can pick either type of coercive controller – I’m not looking for a correct answer – just looking for you to clearly justify your conclusion!

Part 2. Evan Miller Case Study

Part 3. Criminology Lecture

Part 2. Competence

Part 3. Criminal Responsibility and NGRI

The fact that Stockholm Syndrome is NOT in the DSM-5 suggests that the judge should conclude evidence of Stockholm Syndrome in admissible based on which Daubert factor?

A veterinarian who has a patient with congestive heart failure (CHF) administers _____ in hopes of improving the heart’s ability to pump blood by increasing the calcium concentration.

A drug’s package insert states that the drug is an anticestodal.  Against what type of parasite will this drug be effective?

This diuretic is actually mostly used for cerebral edema: