Group polarization is defined as:

SIMCA predicts collective action is most likely when people have:

Soh et al. (2024) propose four mechanisms linking identity and digital environments. If someone chooses platforms that align with a desired identity and avoids others, that is:

A person tries to correct an initial snap judgment after realizing it might be biased. In dual-process terms, this is best described as:

Classic deindividuation predicts anonymity weakens norms because it:

Many people in class answered “yolk” when asked “What do you call the white of an egg?” This demo best illustrates:

Someone tries a new identity label online, receives supportive feedback, and then brings that confidence into offline choices (clubs, friends, major). Soh et al. would call that:

A lower-status group believes the hierarchy is stable and legitimate, and that boundaries are permeable (members can “move up” individually). According to Tajfel & Turner, which response is most likely?

Intergroup contact can reduce disadvantaged-group support for social change when the contact:

Two student clubs (A and B) have never competed for resources, but the university posts a ranked “prestige list” that compares them. Afterward, Club A members start subtly mocking Club B and exaggerating small differences in competence. Which explanation best fits this pattern?