(02.02, 02.06, 02.07 HC)Presidential Approval Ratings During…
(02.02, 02.06, 02.07 HC)Presidential Approval Ratings During First Year in Office (Selected Presidents)PresidentPartyYearApproval RatingĀ (End of First Year)Harry S. TrumanDemocratic194582%Dwight D. EisenhowerRepublican195369%John F. KennedyDemocratic196174%Lyndon B. JohnsonDemocratic196378%Richard NixonRepublican196949%Jimmy CarterDemocratic197750%Ronald ReaganRepublican198149%George H. W. BushRepublican198961%Bill ClintonDemocratic199355%George W. BushRepublican200183%Barack ObamaDemocratic200947%Donald TrumpRepublican201739%Joe BidenDemocratic202141%Identify the president in the table who had the highest approval rating at the end of their first year in office.Describe a trend in the approval ratings listed in the table.Draw a conclusion that explains the trend in the table.Explain how a president’s approval rating can impact their ability to influence the policymaking process in Congress.
Read Details(01.06 HC)In 2021, President Biden issued an executive order…
(01.06 HC)In 2021, President Biden issued an executive order directing the Department of Education to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loan debt for millions of borrowers, citing the economic hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. This action was taken without explicit congressional approval.Following President Biden’s executive order on student loan forgiveness, several states and conservative groups filed lawsuits challenging its constitutionality. These cases quickly made their way through the federal court system, with conflicting rulings at lower levels. In February 2023, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the consolidated cases of Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown. Describe a power Congress could use to address the information outlined in the scenario. In the context of the scenario, explain how the Supreme Court could respond to Congress’s action in Part A. If Congress decided to address the issue in the scenario, explain how the President could respond to its action.
Read Details(01.06 HC)Roscoe Filburn, an Ohio farmer, grew wheat for per…
(01.06 HC)Roscoe Filburn, an Ohio farmer, grew wheat for personal consumption and to feed his livestock, exceeding the production quota set by the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938. Filburn argued that his actions were beyond Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce since the wheat was not sold and remained within state borders. However, the Court unanimously ruled against Filburn, holding that even purely local activities could be regulated if they had a substantial economic effect on interstate commerce when aggregated with similar actions by others.The Court reasoned that Filburn’s wheat production, though small, still affected the national wheat market by reducing demand for commercially sold wheat. The Court’s ruling established the “aggregation principle,” which states that Congress can regulate trivial individual actions that, when combined, substantially impact interstate commerce. This landmark case laid the foundation for increased federal regulation in various areas, including civil rights, environmental protection, and labor laws, and remains a crucial precedent in constitutional law debates over the limits of federal power.Identify a constitutional clause that is common to Wickard v. Filburn (1942) and U.S. v. Lopez (1995).Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of U.S. v. Lopez led to a different outcome from the holding in Wickard v. Filburn.Explain how the holding in Wickard v. Filburn affected the balance of power between the states and the national government.
Read Details