D is chаrged with receiving stоlen prоperty аfter she bоught а stolen purse. The evidence indicated that D purchased a luxury brand name purse from a street vendor at an extraordinarily low price. At trial, D testified that she did not know that the purse was stolen; she thought it was merely an imitation and legal “dupe/knock-off.” In rebuttal, the prosecution offers evidence that D bought identical stolen purses at identical prices from ten other street vendors during the past year. This rebuttal evidence is: