Sаm crаshed his cаr intо Quentin’s antique shоp оn the way home from a bar. Quentin smelled beer on Sam’s breath and sued Sam for negligence, claiming Sam was driving drunk. Sam denied intoxication. While the lawsuit was pending, Sam’s attorney met with Quentin’s attorney and said: “Listen, I talked to the bartender who was on duty that night. It turns out my client ordered quite a few beers before the accident occurred. Given that, I will offer you $500,000. I do not think a jury will give you more than that.” Quentin said nothing in response and the next day, tracked down the bartender. At trial, Quentin seeks to admit the lawyer’s statements, as well as testimony by the bartender about the beers that Sam consumed. Are these items of evidence admissible under the FRE?