Tаble 2-9 Wilmа Betty Stаtues 12 14 Benches 4 7 Table 2-9 shоws the оutput per mоnth of two people, Wilma and Betty. They can either devote their time to making marble statues or making marble benches. Refer to Table 2-9. Which of the following statements is true?
Tоpic: Fоr this аssignment, yоu will compаre (discuss similаrities) or contrast (discuss differences) two short stories we have reviewed in class (listed on your course schedule/Canvas). Your essay should focus on how both short stories use literary elements and/or devices to develop or portray a certain theme or main idea. Remember that an analysis is not a summary. Look at the questions on page 7 and the thesis templates on page 8 of "Writing a Literary Analysis Essay: Short Story Edition" to help you get started. Elements to Include in Your Essay: Your essay will be a total of 5 paragraphs (one introduction, three body paragraphs, and one conclusion). Each body paragraph should have 6-8 sentences. The introduction and conclusion should have at least 5 sentences. Each body paragraph should support your thesis and analyze specific literary elements or devices such as imagery, symbolism, tone, the title, figurative language, rhyme scheme, historical context, conflict, characters, etc. Purpose: The purpose of this essay is to familiarize you with analyzing literature and writing in MLA format. A literary analysis involves critically examining and interpreting a work of literature by closely observing its literary elements and devices (including the historical context) and explaining how those elements contribute to both short stories' overall meaning, message, and impact on the reader. Outside Sources: For this assignment, you will use two short stories from the course schedule/Canvas. You can also use any of the resources provided for you on Canvas as well as printed resources provided in class. No other sources are permitted. Plagiarized essays, which includes using the assistance of AI, will be given a zero. Format: This essay is to be written in MLA format. Include a header with your last name page # in the top right corner of the page. Include a heading with your name, instructor’s name, course, and assignment due date. Include an original title in the center of the page. Write on every other line on your physical paper. When citing sources, include in-text citations and a Works Cited page. Use present-tense verbs (words like "are," "is," and "wants"). DO NOT use contractions (such as "didn't") in your essay. Use third-person point-of-view in this essay. DO NOT use first (I, we, our, us) or second-person point-of-view (any form of you). A Successful Essay: An effective essay successfully addresses and elaborates the topic chosen. Your thesis statement should be clear and easy to identify in the introduction paragraph, and the body paragraphs of your essay should refer back to the thesis. This essay should be well-organized, engaging, properly formatted, and free of major grammatical errors.
OBJECTIVE. Yоu will reаd а stellаr example оf persuasiоn (an article) and write a rhetorical analysis essay that examines how the author constructs an argument and conveys their message to a specific audience. Your task is not to summarize the content or state whether you agree with the author, but to analyze how the author uses rhetorical strategies to achieve their purpose. INSTRUCTIONS Read the Passage Carefully Annotate as you read. Identify the author’s purpose, audience, and Kairos. Take note of rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, logos, diction, syntax, imagery, storytelling, etc. Plan Your Essay Create a brief outline before writing (see below). Locate direct quotes that will support your observations. Write Your Essay Paragraph 1: Begin with an introduction that establishes the article’s Rhetorical Situation. This first paragraph should include the author’s name, title of the work, purpose (what is the text arguing?), Kairos (what events inspired the author to write?), and the audience. You can also start with Kairos, then transition to author, purpose, and audience. Paragraph 2: Analyze the Situated and Invented Ethos. Ethos=Reasons to Trust. Paragraph 3: Analyze the Logos. Logos=Reasons to Believe. Locate at least two examples of logos. Paragraph 4: Analyze the Pathos. Pathos=Reasons to feel an emotion AND to remember what we value. Paragraph 5: Synthesis. Look for two pieces of quoted evidence that simultaneously function as logos, pathos, and ethos. Synthesize the evidence. Paragraph 6: Evaluation. What is good about the rhetoric? What is bad about the rhetoric? Consider the logos/pathos/ethos strengths. Put on your “crap detector” to write this evaluation. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ HERE is the Excellent Example of Rhetoric that You Will Now Analyze: "When Life Gets Heavy, Step Into Nature!" By Davis Pye, published by The Oregonian on Aug. 24, 2025 America is losing credibility as a democracy, with Freedom House now ranking the United States less free than former dictatorships such as Argentina, Taiwan and the Czech Republic. We lag in well-being, with life expectancy shorter in Washington than in Beijing. We trail in education: A young person in once-impoverished South Korea is today far more likely to finish high school and get a college education than an American. Yet there is at least one area where the United States still excels: our wild places. We have some of the world’s most glorious wilderness — and if you want to salve the pain of other national failures, one of the best ways to do that is to accumulate blisters and mosquito bites on our magnificent hiking trails. Taking in these trails is also an opportunity to contrast today’s political myopia with the foresight of visionaries like President Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot, his conservationist friend, who under Roosevelt became the first chief of the U.S. Forest Service (and later served as the governor of Pennsylvania). Many government policies are forgotten just a few years later, but the instinct of Roosevelt and Pinchot to set aside wild public lands is one that enriches us more than a century afterward: It helped preserve wild places for us to enjoy, and for our unborn great-grandchildren to cherish in the 22nd century. I thought about this the other day when I was backpacking with my family in the Wallowa Mountains of Eastern Oregon, my wife and I egged on by our kids to try something called the Wallowa High Route. It’s a vague path — or sometimes no path at all — meandering above the timberline past Alpine lakes and connecting a series of peaks. You’re as likely to see mountain goats as other hikers. When evening came, we found a flat, grassy spot and laid out our sleeping bags under the stars. We looked for shooting stars, hoped it wouldn’t rain, and then we were asleep. I’ve backpacked my whole life, including three trips this summer, but in recent years, as world and national events have become dispiriting, the wilderness has become particularly important to my sanity. Some people see therapists; I visit mountains. When I was writing my memoir, I basically diagnosed myself with what I thought of as a mild case of PTSD from covering too many wars and atrocities, particularly the Darfur genocide. In retrospect, that was when I stepped up my backpacking. Perhaps I unconsciously prescribed myself wilderness therapy. So my daughter and I hiked the 2,650-mile Pacific Crest Trail from Mexico to Canada over six summers — the best parenting I ever did. Some people find such refuge from the world’s storms in a church or other house of worship, but I find it in the cathedral of wilderness — “God’s first temples,” as John Muir put it. Perhaps it’s strange, to some, to equate a church with a mountaintop, but there are commonalities. One element of religious faith is awe at a force larger than ourselves, and who does not feel awe at seeing a glacier reshaping the land or at the delicacy of lupine and paintbrush flowers in a high meadow? Religion also provides perspective, and I find the same is true in the vastness of the wilderness. You understand that it is not all about you. The mountains were here eons ago and will still be here eons from now. I’m also drawn to the hermitlike simplicity that the wilderness forces on backpackers, as an antidote to our material age. I’m a believer in ultralight backpacking, which typically means a pack weight of 10 pounds or less, not counting food and water. In my case that means no stove or tent, just a small tarp in case of rain. The simplicity rocks: It’s thrilling to pass a mountain storm dry and toasty in my sleeping bag as wind, rain and hail lash my tarp but find no entry. So when friends are overwhelmed by the craziness of national and world events, when we’re angry at one another and all society feels taut, my counsel is simple: Take a hike. Alas, this legacy of public lands is threatened by the shortsightedness of today’s leaders. A Republican proposal this year to sell off more than two million acres of public lands faltered because of parliamentary rules, but the idea remains alive. Climate change aggravates forest fires, yet the Trump administration is cutting funding for the Forest Service to fight fires, so more of our wilderness may go up in smoke. Staffing cuts are reportedly leaving some federal treasures with overflowing trash cans and filthy toilets, a blight even on national parks, which have been called “America’s best idea.” The debasement is said to affect even such national icons as Yosemite in California and the Enchantments in Washington State. There’s so much that we Americans are divided about, but we should be able to agree on the importance of our generation’s honoring this natural inheritance and recognizing that these are the most democratic spaces we have. On the trail there is no first class or economy; any of us can enjoy camping spots that no billionaire is able to purchase. No one can pull rank on you — other than a grizzly bear. This is our great heritage to preserve and defend. ______________________________________________________________________________ Author–Davis Pye became a columnist for The Oregonian Opinion desk in 2001 and has won two Pulitzer Prizes. He’s also written a memoir about growing up in the Adirondack Mountains. Publication–According to MediaBiasFactCheck, The Oregonian is rated as “Least Biased” and “High” for Factual Reporting. It is published in Portland, Oregon. DEFINITIONS Myopia: lack of imagination, foresightLinks to an external site., or intellectual insight. Foresight: the ability to predict or the action of predictingLinks to an external site. what will happen or be needed in the future. Despiriting: causing someone to lose enthusiasmLinks to an external site. and hope; dishearteningLinks to an external site.. Hermitlike: resembling or characteristic of a hermit, esp in being reclusive or solitary. Antidote: a medicine taken or given to counteractLinks to an external site. a particular poisonLinks to an external site.…used here as a metaphor. Taut: stretched or pulled tight. Blight: a thing that spoilsLinks to an external site. or damages something. Debasement: the action or process of reducing the quality or value of something. Pulitzer Prize: awarded for achievements in the United States in "journalism, arts and letters.”