Instructiоns: Prоvide thоughtful, well-reаsoned responses to eаch question. Minimum 400 words Cite specific RID/NAIE tenets to support your аnswers, including the number and tenet. Case Study Overview Molly is an educational sign language interpreter working in Wisconsin. She holds a 3.7 Illinois Educational Interpreter Performance Assessment (IEPA) score and a Department of Public Instruction (DPI) license, which allows her to work in K-12 educational settings. Molly frequently substitutes for short and long-term assignments, often in a kindergarten classroom. Scenario Description One day, while working in the kindergarten classroom, a profoundly deaf student was pulled out for a meeting with a social worker. Molly accompanied the student, along with a paraprofessional, into the meeting. During this time, the social worker asked the student various questions about her home life and family. After the meeting, the student returned to class with the paraprofessional and interpreter, and Molly believed that her actions were appropriate, as her license covers interpreting all activities in K-12 settings. A few days later, however, Molly was called into a meeting with the agency owner, who expressed concern that Molly had violated the code of conduct by interpreting in a situation that required a nationally certified and/or legally certified interpreter. The owner claimed that Molly's actions had jeopardized the agency's standing and suspended her from working in that school until further notice. Questions for Consideration Ethical Violation: Was Molly correct in her understanding that her license covered her to interpret in the meeting with the social worker? Why or why not? Certification Requirements: Do you think a legal or nationally certified interpreter was necessary for the scenario described? What factors would determine the need for higher certification in this case? Implications for the Agency: Discuss the potential repercussions for both Molly and the agency resulting from this situation. How might the agency's policies influence the outcome? Guidelines and Best Practices: What guidelines from the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID) or the National Association of Interpreters in Education (NAIE) apply to this scenario? How could these guidelines help interpretive professionals navigate similar situations in the future? Professional Development: What steps could Molly take to ensure she is better prepared for future assignments that may involve sensitive topics?
A. ¿Qué tiene que hаcer lа fаmilia Fernández?: Fernández’s family has tоns оf things tо do. According to the context complete the sentences using a personal care item or chores. Help the family to choose which items and chores are the best for each situation below by filling in the blank with the letter of the corresponding answer. Use each word only once. Not all words will be used. (1 pt. each; 6 pts. total) Banco de palabras a. el brillo de labios e. la máquina de afeitar i. sacar la basura b. sacar al perro f. quitar la mesa j. cortar la hierba c. hacer la cama g. pasar la aspiradora k. la navaja de afeitar d. el jabón h. el secador l. el champú Modelo: Marta tiene que lavarse las manos. Necesita _d . Juan tiene que ducharse. Es importante usar [1] para lavarse el pelo. El piso de la casa está sucio. Lupita tiene que [2] en la sala. Cuando Alberto se afeita, tiene cuidado con [3] porque se puede cortar. Como el pelo de María está mojado (wet) necesita usar [4]. Todas las mañanas la abuela Antonia tiene que [5] de su dormitorio cuando se levanta. Cuando la familia termina de comer los niños tienen que [6] antes de llenar el lavaplatos.