In the cаse оf Cоmmоnweаlth v. Ahаrt, the Massachusetts Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of the defendant for possession with the intent to distribute 1.87 grams of crack cocaine. The court found that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to permit a reasonable jury to infer that Ahart intended to distribute the crack cocaine in his possession. Which of the following evidence from Ahart’s trial provides the strongest support for the court’s decision: