In the following reaction, what species undergoes oxidation? 2Fe (s)+ 3ZnCl2(aq)  -> 2FeCl3(aq) + 3Zn(s)

What is the molar mass of Mg(NO2)2?

Attorney Aaron was approached by Husband Harry and Wife Willow who had decided to dissolve their marriage. They had no children and had worked out a tentative mutual property settlement. They did not want to retain separate lawyers because they hoped to save money and believed that working with one attorney was more likely to result in a reasonably amicable dissolution. Before coming to Attorney Aaron, they had drafted and each had signed a written agreement not to run up the costs and increase the adversarial nature of the dissolution by retaining separate lawyers.Attorney Aaron believed that he was able to provide competent and diligent representation to both Husband Harry and Wife Willow. Attorney Aaron consulted with both independently concerning the implications of the common representation, including the advantages and risks involved and the effect on their respective attorney-client privileges. Attorney Aaron reduced the disclosures to writing in the form of a written retainer agreement and gave them each several days to consult independent legal counsel if they so desired. Husband Harry and Wife Willow each chose not to consult independent counsel.After six months of reasonably amicable negotiations, Wife Willow announced that she had changed her mind about the representation and had decided to retain her own lawyer. However, after Husband Harry and Attorney Aaron insisted that she was obligated to adhere to her prior written agreement, Wife Willow reluctantly agreed to abide by it. Attorney Aaron was then able to draft a property settlement agreement satisfactory to both parties.Is Attorney Aaron subject to discipline for his conduct in the representation?

What statement best defines and explains the term “essential amino acids”?

Convert {x} L to mL. Answer with the proper number of significant figures and unit abbreviation. 

Which of the following compounds contains only a polar covalent bond? 

Attorney Audrey worked for the State X Transportation Agency that set taxicab fares in various cities within State X. State X Transportation Agency’s rules required taxicab companies to submit information about their costs and operating practices, which State X Transportation Agency was prohibited from disclosing to the public.Attorney Audrey left State X Transportation Agency a year ago and joined Law Firm ABC, a private law firm. One of the partners at Law Firm ABC now wishes to accept the representation of a ride-sharing service that competes with taxicab companies in one of the cities. Information about the costs and operating practices of taxicab companies could be used by the ride-sharing service to the disadvantage of the taxicab companies.What must the Law Firm ABC partner or Attorney Audrey do to enable Law Firm ABC to represent the ride-sharing service?

Judge Martin took a case under advisement after both parties had completed the presentation of evidence and arguments. The case had been tried without a jury but involved a difficult fact issue of causation and a difficult issue of law.After the case had been under advisement for several weeks, Lawyer Lee, the plaintiff’s attorney, heard rumors that Judge Martin was having difficulty determining the issue of factual causation and was uncertain about the applicable law. Lawyer Lee telephoned Judge Martin, told her of the rumors he had heard, and asked Judge Martin if she would like to reopen the case for additional evidence and briefing from both parties. Thereafter, Judge Martin reopened the case for further testimony and requested supplementary briefs from both parties.Was it proper for Lawyer Lee to communicate with Judge Martin?

How many valence electrons are present in carbon (C)? 

Susan, a sole practitioner, recently suffered an aneurysm and was advised that she could not return to work for four months. Susan delivered all of her clients’ files to Elizabeth, an experienced lawyer in another law firm. Elizabeth agreed to review each client’s file promptly, take any action necessary to protect each client’s interests, and treat the information in the files as confidential. Susan then wrote to her clients, informing each client that the client’s file had been delivered to Elizabeth for review and for any action necessary to protect the client’s interests, and that the client was free to select another lawyer.Susan knew that Elizabeth was competent. Before accepting the client files, Elizabeth conducted a conflicts check to ensure that she did not accept the file of any person whose interests were, or could be, adverse to the interests of any of the current or former clients of Elizabeth’s law firm.Was it proper for Susan to deliver the files to Elizabeth for review?