VRAAG 2     As jy in Antieke Egipte gebly het, watter werk sou jy doen behalwe om Farao te wees? Verduidelik jou antwoord deur om ‘n baie goeie rede vir jou keuse te gee. (3)

The matter proceeds to trial. Before the hearing commences, Martin expresses to you his worries about the outcome of the trial because he has cash flow problems. The trial proceeds, and judgment is given in favour of both Martin and Nicky, with a finding that Grazier was entirely liable for the damage caused to the sheep by the supply of unsuitable food supplements and Martin’s consequential losses. While critical of Nicky’s delayed diagnosis, the Judge did not consider that Nicky’s actions amounted to negligence.  Which of the following is the most likely costs order that the Judge will make?                                                                                        

You are asked to advise David as to whether he should take action to have Melia comply with the direction given for exchange of witness statements. What is the most appropriate advice to give David in response?    

1.2 Die Egiptenare, wie baie ryk was, was mal daaroor om juwele te dra. Benoem twee materiale waarvan hul juwele gemaak was. (2)

2.3 Beskryf die huise van die algemene Egiptenare. Hulle huise was ontwerp met plat dakke. Wat was die rede hiervoor? (2)

Totaal van afdeling A  [13]

3.1 Watter werk sou hierdie man in Antieke Egipte gehad het? (1)

3.1 Watter werk sou hierdie man in Antieke Egipte gehad het? (1)

Marina is owed £15,000 by Recruitment Ltd (“Recruitment”). The debt relates to monies due for services provided by Marina under the terms of a catering contract with Recruitment. Recruitment disputes the monies are owed. Marina has threatened that if Recruitment does not pay, she will issue proceedings. Recruitment believes it has a complete defence and will be successful in any proceedings. However, it has heard that Marina is in financial difficulties, and is concerned that if it is successful it will be unable to recover its costs of having to defend the proceedings. You are asked to advise Recruitment regarding security for costs. What is the correct advice to give Recruitment?         

Triangle asks your advice on what the Part 36 consequences may be if the Judge at trial awards a sum inclusive of interest which is less than Robert’s Part 36 offer. What is the correct advice to give in response to Triangle’s question?