Attorney Bea, a criminal defense attorney, was appointed to represent Ingrid, an indigent defendant, accused of assaulting an elderly man. A year earlier, a woman severely beat Attorney Bea’s elderly grandfather; the woman was subsequently convicted and sent to prison. Because Attorney Bea had been extremely upset by these events, she had since declined to represent in her private practice any individual accused of physically assaulting an elderly person.  Nevertheless, because of the court appointment, Attorney Bea agreed to meet with Ingrid. After interviewing Ingrid, Attorney Bea believed that she could competently represent her, but that her repugnance toward Ingrid would be likely to impair the lawyer-client relationship. As a result, Attorney Bea sought to avoid the appointment, informing the court of her reasons for doing so without revealing any of Ingrid’s confidences.  Was Attorney Bea’s conduct proper?

Harry and Wilma are married but are fighting over custody of their minor children in an acrimonious marital dissolution proceeding. Harry believes that a favorable ruling of custody for him is more likely if he can show that Wilma engaged in improper or illegal behavior. Harry appeared in a crowded courtroom for a trial setting conference in the marital dissolution proceeding. His leg was heavily bandaged and he was using crutches to walk. When the judge called the case, Wilma stated that she was ready for trial but Harry asked for a continuance to allow him to receive needed physical therapy. When asked about the bandaged leg and crutches, Harry told the judge that Wilma had hit him with her car when he came to the family home to visit the children. Harry added that he was going to file a criminal complaint while in the courthouse against Wilma. The judge agreed to continue the trial setting conference for 90 days while Harry obtained physical therapy and the potential assault and battery was investigated and prosecuted, by the district attorney. Harry filed a criminal complaint with the prosecutor’s office against Wilma. She was arrested, charged and released on her own recognizance. Harry posted pictures – on Tell-It-All, a large social media platform with over 5 million users – of his bandaged leg and an old picture of Wilma dressed as a witch at a past Halloween party. The text accompanying the pictures contained allegations that “my wife” had tried to kill him. The investigator for the prosecutor’s office learned that there never had been any suggestion of violence between Harry and Wilma and that there was no evidence of damage to Wilma’s car or that Harry had sought medical treatment in connection with the alleged incident. The prosecutor obtained a dismissal of all charges against Wilma. Wilma then sued Harry for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and defamation. What is the likelihood of Wilma prevailing on each of the claims alleged in her civil action? Discuss fully.

Martha Finnemore aligns with the constructivist theory in IR.

Niccolò Machiavelli’s IR perspective can be summarized as:

Liberalism in IR emphasizes:

You are required to write short essay responses to the question provided. Each response should be 7 to 12 complete sentences in length. Your goal is to demonstrate clear understanding, critical thinking, and the ability to apply psychological concepts accurately and thoughtfully. Proper English mechanics, spelling and grammar will be assessed as well.  If plagiarism or cheating of any kind or copy and paste is suspected you will not be rewarded any points. Translation devices are also not allowed on exams.    Compare and contrast realism and liberalism in terms of their assumptions about human nature, the role of power, and prospects for peace. Use at least two historical or contemporary examples to illustrate your points.

Identify two non-governmental organizations and briefly explain their global roles.

In IR, intergovernmental organizations are:

In IR, the term state is best defined as:

What is a characteristic of a contention-based access method?