¶ N. We have a contract interpretation issue here. A judge, ruling on what the contract meant, would use these tools of contract interpretation in what order (first to last)?

¶ A, lines 11-12.  Fielding responded, saying there would be an agreement, but only if a title search on the building came back with no liens.This is a valid contract, but with a

¶ G. Regarding Peter’s offer to manufacture one machine, and Pru’s acceptance by email and attempt to “unaccept.”Is there a valid contract for Peter to manufacture?

¶ A, line 10.  On Monday May 16, Midstate told Fielding “you have a deal.” Choose the correct answer: 

¶ J, lines 73-75. Because the Torte Bomber machine was a unique machine, Pru asked Nadiya to sign an agreement saying that if, for any reason, Nadiya left PruBerrys employment she would not (a) work for another bakery for three (3) years, (b) anywhere in the United States. The contract discussed between PruBerrys and Nadiya is:

¶ N, lines 107-08.  KitchenButler, following the order, started building the machine.If there is a contract dispute at this point (after KitchenButler started building but before a written contract was signed), which is true?

¶ C, lines 29-30.  Keller Station sues for court costs (filing, service of process, etc.) and attorneys fees related to bringing the lawsuit.  These damages are:

¶ F, line 48 and Exhibit B-2.  Peter’s offer was to make one (1) machine, and Pru asked for two (2) machines.Under the UCC, which is true?

¶ B, lines 24-25. While not at the rent desired, on June 1, Fielding showed up and started bringing in shelves and items for sale in Suite 104.   Which is true? 

End of ¶ H.  If the cost of inputs for the machine goes up after the facts in this paragraph have occurred, what remedy does Peter and KitchenButler have, if any?