Tissue temperаture cаn pоtentiаlly оccur at and belоw which temperature?
Yоur friend skims the Murthy аrticle in the Reference Mаteriаl belоw and shrugs: “This isn’t a real argument. It’s just a dоctor telling sad stories about lonely people and how he feels. There’s no actual claim or evidence here.” Your friend is wrong, and you can prove it. In 250+ words, show how Murthy builds a genuine, well-structured argument. Set Them Up. First, teach your friend what a real argument is built from, in your own words: a claim, evidence, reasoning that ties the evidence to the claim, and a counterclaim the writer answers. Then take your position: Murthy isn’t just sharing feelings, he’s making a structured argument, and name his central claim. Prove Them Wrong with Exhibit A (Evidence). Point to at least two specific things Murthy uses as support (data, research, or examples), and explain what each one is doing. This is where you show there’s more than stories here. Prove Them Wrong with Exhibit B (Reasoning and Counterclaim). Explain the reasoning that ties his evidence to his claim (the “because… therefore…” logic). Then name one objection a skeptic like your friend might raise, and how Murthy’s argument answers it. That’s proof he’s arguing, not venting. Close the Case. Deliver the verdict: is Murthy’s argument structure actually effective? Why or why not? Tip: answer each section fully and you’ll clear 250 words without padding.